My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2011-06-17_INSPECTION - M1987092
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Inspection
>
Minerals
>
M1987092
>
2011-06-17_INSPECTION - M1987092
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 4:34:34 PM
Creation date
6/20/2011 12:07:24 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1987092
IBM Index Class Name
INSPECTION
Doc Date
6/17/2011
Doc Name
Insp Rpt
From
DRMS
To
Jordan C. and Jone L. Burdick
Inspection Date
6/15/2011
Email Name
ECS
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
oF.co?o COLORADO DIVISION OF RECLAMATION, MINING AND SAFETY <br />yew MINERALS PROGRAM INSPECTION REPORT <br />*K PHONE: (303) 866-3567 <br />} 1876- <br />The Division of Reclamation, Mining and Safety has conducted an inspection of the mining operation <br />noted below. This report documents observations concerning compliance with the terms of the permit <br />and applicable rules and regulations of the Mined Land Reclamation Board. <br />MINE NAME: MINE/PROSPECTING ID#: MINERAL: COUNTY: <br />B & G Stone M-1987-092 Sandstone Larimer <br />INSPECTION TYPE: INSPECTOR(S): DATE: INSP. TIME: <br />Monitoring Eric C. Scott ? une 15, 2011 <br />tune 13:30 <br />OPERATOR: OPERATOR REPRESENTATIVE: TYPE OF OPERATION: <br />Jordan C. and Jone L. Burdick Jordan Burdick 110c - Construction Limited Impact <br />REASON FOR INSPECTION: BOND CALCULATION TYPE: BOND AMOUNT: <br />Normal I&E Program None $14,170.00 <br />DATE OF COMPLAINT: POST INSP. CONTACTS: JOINT INSP. AGENCY: <br />NA None None <br />WEATHER: INS ECTO S TURE: SIGNATURE DATE: <br />Clear dune 17, 2011 <br />The following inspection topics were identified as having Problems or Possible Violations. OPERATORS <br />SHOULD READ THE FOLLOWING PAGES CAREFULLY IN ORDER TO ASSURE COMPLIANCE <br />WITH THE TERMS OF THE PERMIT AND APPLICABLE RULES AND REGULATIONS. If a <br />Possible Violation is indicated, you will be notified under separate cover as to when the Mined Land <br />Reclamation Board will consider possible enforcement action. <br />INSPECTION TOPIC: Financial Warranty <br />PROBLEM/POSSIBLE VIOLATION: Problem: The financial warranty is not adequate to reclaim the site in <br />accordance with the approved reclamation plan. This is a failure to maintain the proper financial warranty <br />amount to complete reclamation of the affected lands pursuant to C.R.S. 34-32.5-117(4)(b) of the Act. <br />CORRECTIVE ACTIONS: The operator shall conduct reclamation sufficient to bring the remaining cost to the <br />posted bond amount or submit adequate financial warranty, as determined by the Division. If adequate <br />reclamation is not performed, the Division will send a separate surety increase notice to the operator regarding the <br />increase of the financial warranty. The operator will have 60 days from the date on the surety increase notice to <br />post the additional financial warranty. <br />CORRECTIVE ACTION DUE DATE: 8/31/11 <br />INSPECTION TOPIC: Hydrologic Balance <br />PROBLEM/POSSIBLE VIOLATION: Problem: The site is improperly impounding surface drainage/runoff. <br />(see attached photo) <br />CORRECTIVE ACTIONS: Submit documentation from the State Engineer's Office demonstrating that the <br />impoundment of water in this pit is authorized by that office. Operator could also remove impediments to proper <br />surface drainage. <br />CORRECTIVE ACTION DUE DATE: 8/31/11 <br />INSPECTION TOPIC: Signs & Markers <br />PROBLEM/POSSIBLE VIOLATION: Problem: The affected area boundary markers are missing or <br />incorrectly placed. This is a problem for failure to maintain boundary markers around the affected area as <br />required by Section 3.1.12(2) of the rule. Also the permit sign has the wrong operation name on it. DRMS permit <br />lists B&G Stone as the operation name - this should be the name on the sign not Rocky Top Stone. <br />Page 1 of 4
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.