Laserfiche WebLink
C- 2010 -088 Fruita Loadout <br />2"" Preliminary Adequacy Review (MLT) <br />25- May -2011 <br />Page 5 of 8 <br />boundary that have been proposed, along with any associated adjustment to the total permit <br />acreage. <br />In the second paragraph of 2.03.6(1), please add language to the effect that the 30' easement <br />is for Haul Road #1 and crosses property owned by Fruita Development, LLC. <br />Section 2.03. 10 does not include list Mesa County in the list of additional permits required. <br />Will the County require a special use permit? Are there any permits that will be required <br />from the City of Fruita? (Page 2.05 -13 says Fruita may annex Haul Road #1.) <br />Is the segment of 15 Road located south of US Hwy 6 & 50 under City, or County, <br />jurisdiction? Will an access / driveway permit be required for 15 Road? <br />2.04.3 Land Use <br />• The first paragraph of Section 2.04.3(1) says private lands are under jurisdictions of Mesa <br />County and City of Fruita. On Map 02 Surface Ownership, please show limits of the City's <br />jurisdiction. <br />2.05.3(3) Roads <br />Haul Road #1 <br />• Typical Section on Map 15 - How will thickness of Pit Run be determined? Is there a <br />minimum thickness? No discussion is provided. <br />• Page 2.05 -13, Haul Road Surfacing, says haul roads will be plated with 10 to 20 inches of <br />gravel surfacing. Please make this description consistent with what is shown on typical <br />sections on Map 15 (including thicknesses of pit run and 1 -1/2" road base). <br />• Page 2.05 -13, Haul Road Maintenance, mentions road shoulders (none are currently <br />proposed, but possibly should be) and paved surface (none proposed). Please review this <br />paragraph to ensure it accurately describes what is proposed. <br />Haul Road #2 <br />The last paragraph on page 2.04 -2 describes coke particulate matter (10,000 cy) that was <br />buried in trenches. Haul Road #2 and the Rail Loop alignments both cross the coke fines <br />area. Has any type of geotechnical investigation been done to ensure this is a suitable <br />foundation for haul road and rail traffic? Is there a minimum thickness of embankment <br />material that will be required to "bridge" across any unsuitable material? <br />The Haul Road 42 Profile is shown on Map 15. Are the buried coke fines close enough to <br />the surface that excavation and replacement with suitable embankment material will be <br />required? <br />Page 2.05 -9 describes what will be done with unsuitable materials encountered in <br />construction of the Rail Loop. Please use similar language to address the handling of <br />unsuitable materials encountered in construction of Haul Road Q. <br />Rail Loon <br />