My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2011-06-06_REVISION - M1981185 (5)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Minerals
>
M1981185
>
2011-06-06_REVISION - M1981185 (5)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 4:34:15 PM
Creation date
6/7/2011 8:03:56 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1981185
IBM Index Class Name
REVISION
Doc Date
6/6/2011
Doc Name
Response to adequacy issue #1 (CN-01)
From
R Squared Inc.
To
DRMS
Email Name
WHE
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
15
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Fourth Adequacy Response 112(d)-1 Application, Amended CN-01 <br />Wildcat Mining Corporation May Day Idaho Mine Complex <br />of Attachment SWMP-2 of Attachment T-4 of Exhibit T of Attachment G-1 of <br />Attachment G for the desired hydrologic calculations. <br />NOTE: Pursuant to Rule 6.5, Exhibit 6.5 is reserved as the Geotechnical <br />Stability Exhibit. Table T5-1, Analyte Laboratory Test, appears to be <br />inappropriately placed within Exhibit 6.5. <br />The Storm Water Management Plan, required under Rule 6.4.21(10)(b), was <br />submitted as Attachment T-4 of Exhibit T of Attachment G-1 of Attachment G. <br />Pursuant to Rule 6.4.21(10)(b), the Storm Water Management Plan should be <br />submitted under Exhibit U, Environmental Protection Plan, and not Exhibit T. <br />Exhibit T is reserved for Permanent Man-Made Structures, pursuant to Rule <br />6.4.20. <br />The Surface Water Quality Data, required under Rule 6.4.21(11)(b), was <br />submitted as Attachment T-5 of Exhibit T of Attachment G-2 of Attachment G. <br />Pursuant to Rule 6.4.21(11)(b), such data should be submitted under Exhibit U <br />and not Exhibit T. <br />Response #6 <br />Comment noted. The company will simplify future permit submittals and responses. <br />Adequacy Issue #7 <br />On April 18, 2011, the Division received the Applicant's response to adequacy issues previously <br />raised by the Division for CN-01. The Applicant's response consisted of 431 pages received at <br />the Division's office in Denver, and 48 pages received at the Division's office in Durango. In <br />the future, please avoid splitting the submitted documents between the various offices of the <br />Division. Please submit the entire package of application materials to the Division's office in <br />Denver. <br />Response #7 <br />Comment noted. In the future all submittals will be sent to DBMS-Denver. <br />6/6/2011
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.