My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2011-06-06_REVISION - M1981185 (56)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Minerals
>
M1981185
>
2011-06-06_REVISION - M1981185 (56)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/15/2021 5:58:13 PM
Creation date
6/7/2011 8:03:42 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1981185
IBM Index Class Name
REVISION
Doc Date
6/6/2011
Doc Name
Geochemistry and water quality review adequacy response (CN-01)
From
R Squared Inc.
To
DRMS
Type & Sequence
CN1
Email Name
WHE
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Geochemistry and Water Quality Review Adequacy Response <br />Wildcat May Day; DRMS File No. M-1981-185 Conversion Application CN-1 <br />Response #3 <br />Noted. <br />Adequacy Issue #4 <br />Adequate. <br />Response #4 <br />Noted. <br />Adequacy Issue #5 <br />A. The use of a ground water quality point of compliance (POC) is acceptable as a proposed <br />location for the characterization of ambient ground water quality. However, the proposal <br />to use the groundwater production well located on the May Day No. 1 bench as a POC <br />may not be acceptable. Under Hard Rock Rule 3.1.7(6)(a), the Division has the authority <br />to require more than one POC. For this site, I recommend at least two POCs, one of <br />which should be directly down-gradient of the tailings deposition location. In addition, <br />under Hard Rock Rule 3.1.7(6)(b), the Division may require a POC at the hydrologically <br />down-gradient limit of the area in which contamination has been identified, or at the <br />facility permit boundary. However, at this time insufficient hydrologic data exist to <br />accurately determine the hydrologically down-gradient limit, so the optimal location for <br />POCs based upon the hydrologic gradient remains unknown. The determination of the <br />remaining POC(s) will depend on data gathered during the baseline hydrologic <br />characterization which is yet to be conducted. The Division cannot sign off on a POC <br />location without appropriate data such as depths to ground water, directions of ground <br />water flow, hydraulic gradient, and other aquifer parameters as deemed necessary, such <br />as hydraulic conductivity. <br />B. It is important to note that the baseline characterization provides protection for the <br />Operator, and therefore inadequate characterization of baseline conditions can expose the <br />Operator to enforcement actions that might have been avoided with adequate <br />characterization. If a future violation of a water quality standard cannot be attributed <br />unequivocally to a pre-operational condition, then the Operator is liable for damages and <br />mitigation of impacts. <br />C. For all boreholes drilled in the permit area, the Applicant is strongly advised to record <br />detailed geologic logs of each borehole so as to provide the information required under <br />Hard Rock Rule 6.4.21(8)(c), i.e., descriptions of "all geologic media down to and <br />including the upper most aquifer under proposed sites of material storage, stockpiles, <br />waste piles, disposal sites, solution containment facilities and other sites within the <br />existing or proposed affected area where such subsurface materials and any associated <br />6/6/11 <br />2
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.