Laserfiche WebLink
Jacob Bauer, Martin and Wood <br />May 20, 2011 <br />Page 2 <br />Under Scenario B, there will be no mining on this site during the approval period and no <br />operational losses to account for. Evaporation will occur from exposure of a total of 7.46 acres <br />of water in four settling and wash ponds and in the mined cell for the entirety of the approval <br />period. Your attached Table 1 B shows the site net evaporation calculations (26.19 acre-feet) <br />and water consumed by site operations (0 acre-feet). Effective precipitation credit was applied <br />to this plan. <br />DEPLETIONS <br />You have provided a monthly breakdown of lagged depletions at this site for each of the <br />aforementioned scenarios in your attached Table 2. The stream depletion model was developed <br />based on the following assumptions: the exposed surface area is 2,030 feet from an active <br />stream, the transmissivity is 100,000 gal/day/ft, the specific yield is 0.2, and the location of the <br />impermeable boundary is 7,875 feet from the live stream. <br />Table 2 shows that under Scenario A, the lagged stream depletions during the period <br />January 2011 - December 2011 are estimated to be 25.57 acre-feet and the lagged stream <br />depletions during the period January 2012 - December 2012 are estimated to be 26.29 acre- <br />feet. These estimates are based upon evaporative losses from the settling and washing ponds, <br />mined cell, and dewatering trench, water removed in the mined product, and water used for dust <br />suppression (see attached Table 1A). As requested in the previous approval letter dated July 2, <br />2009, depletions associated with refilling the dewatered mined cell were accounted for in this <br />request as shown in Table 2 under Scenario A. It was estimated that the mined cell would return <br />to its October 2010 level (approximately 2 feet deep) within one month in August following <br />mining. The volume of water refilled in the cell (2.75 acre-feet) was added to the total <br />evaporation and operational losses in August 2011 and August 2012, and lagged to the stream. <br />An instantaneous credit of 2.75 acre-feet from dewatering the cell prior to mining was removed <br />from stream depletions in June 2011 and June 2012. <br />Table 2 shows that under Scenario B, the lagged stream depletions during the period <br />January 2011 - December 2011 are estimated to be 26.12 acre-feet and the lagged stream <br />depletions during 'the period January 2012 - December 2012 are estimated to be 26.19 acre- <br />feet. These estimates are based upon evaporative losses from the settling and washing ponds, <br />and mined cell (see attached Table 1 B). <br />REPLACEMENTS <br />The proposed sources of replacement water for this pit are a ten year lease to deliver 27 <br />acre-feet annually of fully consumable water from the Board of Water Works of Pueblo (PBWW). <br />The lease water will be provided from the Board's stored water at Clear Creek Reservoir, <br />Turquoise Reservoir, Twin Lakes Reservoir, Pueblo Reservoir, from direct flow transmountain <br />water, reusable return flows from transmountain water, or from any other reservoir or place from <br />which the Board may legally deliver water, and will be delivered to the Arkansas River Near <br />Avondale USGS stream gage. The monthly depletions and replacement requirements are <br />provided on the attached Table 2. A transit loss of one percent was applied to the required <br />monthly replacement amounts, as shown in Table 2. Under Scenario A, estimated replacements <br />are 25.83 acre-feet for the period January 2011 - December 2011, and 26.57 acre-feet for the <br />period January 2012 - December 2012. Under Scenario B, estimated replacements are 26.40