Laserfiche WebLink
Ms. Isgar said that she has been involved in long-term planning for the area for many <br />years and, from her experience, two weeks was not enough time to draft language for a <br />secondary access road Condition. (Activated at 02:48:55) <br />Commissioner White said that he had issue with the prevailing winds report because it <br />was conducted at the Airport, not the Animas Airpark. <br />A motion was made by Commissioner White to continue the project to date-certain of <br />March 22, 2011. (Activated at 02:52:00) <br />Bradley Hight asked to speak again and noted that this project had been in place for a <br />year and questioned why there were last minutes issues being brought up, such as the <br />email from Ms., Jackoby. He said that it was important that they move forward with the <br />project to provide work for their employees. (Activated at 02:52:36) <br />Motion to continue PROJECT #2010-0055, ANIMAS GLACIER GRAVEL PIT CLASS II: <br />Moved by Commissioner White. (Activated at 02:55:30) <br />Vote to continue PROJECT #2010-0055, ANIMAS GLACIER GRAVEL PIT CLASS ll. <br />White Yes <br />Lieb No <br />Hotter No <br />The motion failed by a 1- 2 vote. (Activated at 02:55:32) <br />Motion to approve PROJECT #2010-0055, ANIMAS GLACIER GRAVEL PIT CLASS II <br />with amendments as prepared by staff: Moved by Commissioner Lieb. (Activated at <br />02:55:30) <br />Vote to approve PROJECT #2010-0055, ANIMAS GLACIER GRAVEL PIT CLASS II <br />with Amendments as prepared by staff. <br />White No <br />Lieb Yes <br />Hotter Yes <br />The motion passed by a 2-1 vote. (Activated at 02:57:20) <br />Findings: <br />1. With the fulfillment of the Conditions of Approval, the applicant has met the submittal <br />requirements for a Class 11 Land Use Permit and provided proof of water, sewer, and <br />access. LPLUC 82-76, 82-161, 82-175, 82-179, 82-181, 82-182(b), 82-183, 82-186 <br />2. The proposal is compatible with the surrounding area provided the conditions listed <br />below are met. LPLUC 82-165, 82-166, 82-167, 82-192 <br />3. The proposal is in compliance with the Amended and Restated Intergovernmental <br />Agreement Regarding Joint Land Use Planning between the City of Durango, <br />Colorado and La Plata County, Colorado. <br />La Plata Board of County Commissioners Page 12 3/112011 <br />n? <br />71 <br />J .? ltv???w L,,e.?+in?A.s ?tact?..R. 6¢AVSL, <br />Qi- 44(P,?, fT M - PA66- M -Z9