2011-05-03_PERMIT FILE - P2011009

• Permit No: P2011009
• IBM Index Class Name: PERMIT FILE
• Doc Date: 5/3/2011
• Doc Name: Notice Incomplete and Deficient
• From: DRMS
• To: Grayling LLC
• Email Name: RCO
• Media Type: D
• Archive: No

STATE OF COLORADO'
DIVISION OF RECLAMATION, MINING AND SAFETY
Department of Natural Resources
1313 Sherman St., Room 215
Denver, Colorado 80203
Phone: [phone]
FAX: [phone]
May 3, 2011
Karmen King
Grayling LLC
18050 Road G
Cortez, CO 81321
REVEI VMAY o9 2011

Division or ker-lamation,
Mining and Safety
COLORADO
D IV IS I ON OF
RECLAMATION
MINING
SAFETY
John W. Hickenlooper
Governor
Mike King
Executive Director
Loretta E. Pineda
Director
Re: Lower Mountain Top Mine, Notice of Intent (NOI), File No. P-2011-009, Notice Incomplete and Deficient.
Dear Ms. King,
The Division has reviewed the above-named NOI materials and has identified several items that are either lacking or
appear to be deficient. These items are explained in the paragraphs below. Please respond to each item.
1. On the Public Form 2, the location information is incomplete: the boxes indicating township, range, and
principal meridian were not marked. Please provide replacement pages with this information correctly filled
in. (Note: The location information in Confidential Form lwas correctly and completely provided; no
replacement is needed for it.)
2. On Public Form 2, the signature page appears to have been borrowed from Form 1. Please provide a signed
and initialed signature page from the appropriate (Form 2) packet.
3. The area of the project is described in the narrative as 1.00 acre. The "working surface area" delineated on
the project maps (Figures 3 and 4) is estimated by this office to be nearly four acres. Please explain the
discrepancy, or revise the acreage figure or the maps, so that they correlate. (This is needed on maps for both
Form 1 and Form 2.)
4. The north arrows on the same maps (Figures 3 and 4) appear to point westerly instead of north. Please
provide revised maps with the proper corrections made. (This is needed on maps for both Forms 1 and 2.)
5. One further comment about the Figure 3 and Figure 4 maps: the existing concrete slab appears to rotate about
30 degrees from one figure to the next. It is assumed that this was an inadvertent mapping error, and that
changing the slab was not proposed. Please clarify this issue or revise this feature on the figures.
6. The proposed affected area lies on two patented claims (Zigzag M.S. and Blythe) as shown on Figures 3 and
4. However, the affected area extends beyond the claims, raising the question of land ownership and
prospector's right-of-entry onto or through those lands. Please provide the information needed for these
questions, or revise the affected area.
Office of Office of
Mined Land Reclamation Denver • Grand Junction • Durango Active and Inactive Mines