My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
_INSPECTION - C1981010 (70)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Inspection
>
Coal
>
C1981010
>
_INSPECTION - C1981010 (70)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/6/2020 5:22:00 AM
Creation date
5/3/2011 1:47:57 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981010
IBM Index Class Name
INSPECTION
Doc Name
Inspection Report
From
DRMS
To
Trapper Mining, Inc
Inspection Date
4/26/2011
Email Name
RDZ
Media Type
D
Archive
No
Tags
DRMS Re-OCR
Description:
Signifies Re-OCR Process Performed
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
April 26, 2011 C-1981-010/Trapper Mine RDZ <br /> Inspection Topic Summary <br /> NOTE: Y=Inspected N=Not Inspected R=Comments Noted V=Violation Issued NA=Not Applicable <br /> R -Air Resource Protection R -Roads <br /> R -Availability of Records R -Reclamation Success <br /> Y -Backfill&Grading Y -Revegetation <br /> R -Excess Spoil and Dev.Waste NA - Subsidence <br /> Y -Explosives Y - Slides and Other Damage <br /> Y -Fish&Wildlife R - Support Facilities On-site <br /> R -Hydrologic Balance R -Signs and Markers <br /> R -Gen. Compliance With Mine Plan NA -Support Facilities Not On-site <br /> R -Other NA -Special Categories Of Mining <br /> NA -Processing Waste Y -Topsoil <br /> COMMENTS <br /> This complete coal inspection was conducted on April 26 -27, 2011 by Rob Zuber of the Colorado Division of <br /> Reclamation,Mining, and Safety(Division). The purpose of the inspection was to evaluate the on-the-ground <br /> condition with respect to Trapper Mine's mining and environmental protection activities. Graham Roberts of TMI <br /> accompanied the inspection in the field. <br /> The weather was at times snowing and at times partly cloudy. The ground was partially covered with snow at <br /> higher elevations. <br /> AIR RESOURCE PROTECTION—Rule 4.17: <br /> Roads and other activities were not a significant source of fugitive dust during the inspection. <br /> AVAILABILITY OF RECORDS—Rule 5.02.4(1): <br /> The records were found to be in compliance. See checklist in report. <br /> EXCESS SPOIL and DEVELOPMENT WASTE—Rule 4.09: <br /> The K Ridge and Horse Gulch Fill were found to be in compliance with the permit. Some rills were observed on <br /> the Horse Gulch Fill; these should be monitored in the future. <br /> HYDROLOGIC BALANCE -Rule 4.05: <br /> During the inspection, Graham Roberts monitored water quality at eight CDPS sites where flow existed. His <br /> monitoring techniques were found to be in compliance with procedures in the permit and with DRMS regulations. <br /> Ponds associated with the eight CDPS monitoring sites were inspected:No Name#5R,Johnson#1 OR,West Pyeatt <br /> #2,East Pyeatt#3,Oak#2,Middle Flume#3,East Middle Flume, and Horse. <br /> Number of Partial Inspection this Fiscal Year: 8 <br /> Number of Complete Inspections this Fiscal Year: 4 <br /> Page 2 of 10 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.