My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2011-04-22_REVISION - C1981019
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Coal
>
C1981019
>
2011-04-22_REVISION - C1981019
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 4:32:47 PM
Creation date
4/26/2011 1:21:48 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981019
IBM Index Class Name
REVISION
Doc Date
4/22/2011
Doc Name
2nd Adequacy Review Letter
From
DRMS
To
Colowyo Coal Company
Type & Sequence
PR3
Email Name
JHB
KAG
RDZ
TAK
MLT
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
27
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Colowyo, C1981-019, PR3 adequacy No. 2 2 April 22, 2011 <br />context of site description or as a land use. Please provide a description of t°his'area'along with <br />a brief history, its mission, ownership, and management practices. (Rule 2.04.3(1)) BFl3 <br />CCC includeda discussion regarding Morgan Creek Ranch on Rule 2, pages 18-19. This <br />response addresses the Division's concern. <br />2. A description of the local topography was not included in the land description. Please include a <br />description of the'local topographywithin the proposed disturbance area. (Rule 2.104.?(2),(b)(i)) <br />CCC appropriately responded to this"item. Ais item is resolved. <br />3. It was not stated in the text whether the Collom expansion area has a mining history. Please <br />include a statement indicating any mining history and include the details requested in Rule <br />2.04.3(3)(a7f) if there is a history of mining in the proposed disturbance area. BF8 <br />CCC comments in the.response letter, dated March 25 201,1, that there has been no historic <br />mining other than CCC's own explorati6a. However, it was not stated in the perinit text <br />whether the Collom expansion area'has had a mining history. In CCC's response in thefirst <br />adequacy review, it stated that "there has been no organized mining activity in the Collozn <br />expansion area in recent history beyond. exploratory drilling activities." Please include this <br />statement in the pertmt'text which will -meet the requirements of Rule 2.04.30)(a-0. <br />Rule 2.04 .5 Ge eral ]?_escription.sof HydWoay aiicl Geology' <br />The application is adequate with regard to this Rule. <br />Rule 2.04.7 Hydrology Description L; <br />I . In Table 2.04.7745, some of the data may be in 'error. For the stream flow data,`se of the <br />dates are consistent with data on the USGS web site, but some are not. For example, the web <br />site indicates peak flow data from 1904 to 2009 for site 9251,000 (Yampa River near Maybeil), i <br />but the table in the application has different dates. Another example is site 9250700 (Morgan <br />Gulch) as the wrong ye4r is listed in the table; it should be 1980 not 1981. Please check this <br />data and correct as necessary. <br />The data is available on the USGS site. The number for the site is "09250700" rather than <br />"9250700" as originally stated in the Division's letter. Also, this site can be accessed by name, <br />"Morgan Gulch near Axial, -Colorado," rather than by number. Please check this data again and <br />correct as necessary. <br />2. Spring V25 is described as being in Collom Gulch but is shown in Little Collom Gulch. Please <br />review and correct as necessary. <br />The response was adequate. Colowyo has updated the text on page 47 of Rule 2. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.