My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2011-04-15_PERMIT FILE - M2010049 (4)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Permit File
>
Minerals
>
M2010049
>
2011-04-15_PERMIT FILE - M2010049 (4)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 4:32:39 PM
Creation date
4/25/2011 2:23:29 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M2010049
IBM Index Class Name
PERMIT FILE
Doc Date
4/15/2011
Doc Name
Reply to Preliminary Adequacy Review
From
Varra Companies, Inc.
To
DRMS
Email Name
MAC
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
47
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
The Division requested the Applicant submit a list of wells located within the <br />cone of depression, a report indicating potential impacts to these wells and a <br />groundwater monitoring plan to verify the presence or absence of impacts to <br />the groundwater system. At a minimum, the monitoring plan should include <br />the following: <br />a) The location of monitoring stations. <br />b) The frequency of water table elevation to be collected. <br />c) Commitments for reporting measurements to the Division. <br />d) Water level criteria that will be used to determine when an adverse affect to <br />groundwater has occurred. <br />e) Commitments for mitigation in the event the adverse impact criteria are <br />exceeded. <br />Please refer to the included Water Well Map, showing the well locations and <br />associated identity, summary List of wells shown. Even though impacts are <br />expected to be minimal, at the request of the OMLR, quarterly monitoring is <br />proposed with sampling to occur at the piezometer wells identified on the Water <br />Well Map (see legend). The results of all measurements will be included in the <br />required Annual Report to the OMLR. Parts d and e are addressed in <br />correspondence from C.G.R.S. of 14 April 2011, as included with this reply. <br />4. The Applicant has stated a Technical Revision may be submitted to allow for <br />the lining of the pits. As noted in the Division's previous Adequacy Review <br />Letter, the Division considers lined pits to be a developed water resource, <br />which would constitute a significant change from the proposed post-mining <br />land use of industrial/commercial and would require an Amendment rather <br />than a Technical Revision. The Division understands mine sites may be <br />reclaimed to multiple land uses. However, if the Applicant does not identify <br />`developed water resource' as one of the post-mining land uses, then the <br />Applicant will be required to amend the Reclamation Permit should they <br />decide to line the pits in the future. It is common practice to identify multiple <br />post-mining land uses on the permit application. The Applicant should be <br />familiar with this practice as they have identified multiple post-mining land <br />uses on previously submitted permit applications (copy enclosed). The <br />Applicant may revise page four of the permit application to include multiple <br />post-mining land uses. <br />Varra Companies, Inc. correspondence of 14 April 2011 to the Colorado Office of Mined Land Reclamation 6 <br />(OMLR) in reply to OMLR correspondence of 14 March 2011 - Western Sugar Reclamation Land <br />Development Project - M-2010-049.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.