My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2011-04-15_PERMIT FILE - M2010049 (4)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Permit File
>
Minerals
>
M2010049
>
2011-04-15_PERMIT FILE - M2010049 (4)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 4:32:39 PM
Creation date
4/25/2011 2:23:29 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M2010049
IBM Index Class Name
PERMIT FILE
Doc Date
4/15/2011
Doc Name
Reply to Preliminary Adequacy Review
From
Varra Companies, Inc.
To
DRMS
Email Name
MAC
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
47
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
The applicant will not extract lands within 400 feet of the center <br />line of the present channel of the Cache La Poudre River until such <br />a time as the pending study is submitted and approved by the <br />OMLR, along with attending plans for flood mitigation to the extent <br />warranted by the said study, either within the timeframe of this <br />application; or subsequent to the approval of this application, as a <br />stipulation of approval that the same shall occur by Technical <br />Revision of the approved permit application. <br />For the record: The applicant maintains that detention is greater than any <br />planned diversion at this location, and as a result creates a net benefit to the <br />floodplain/floodway; and that no compelling evidence to the contrary has been <br />advanced by any party respective of the planned area of activities. We further <br />maintain that the UDFCD guidelines should not apply to stable stream segments, <br />which we maintain is the case at this location. To contend further with the <br />matter at this juncture, however, exceeds the scope and needs of this permit and <br />the capacities of the OMLR. The considerations of extraction and reclamation in <br />the floodplain/floodway have simply broadened to include diverse local, state <br />and federal entities for which imminent resolution cannot be gained within the <br />present confines of the Colorado Mined Land Reclamation Board or the OMLR. <br />To be clear, the applicant is not opposed to performing mutually <br />determined and agreed upon studies that are justified on merit, well <br />defined both as to the components and as to the objectives, and with <br />reasonable measures to provide necessary but coequal and cost effective <br />stabilities and protections for all affected interests. Well stated <br />parameters, assumptions, and reasonably assured cost benefits that <br />complement all interests are unopposed. We believe the necessary <br />dialogue to properly define these parameters has been complicated <br />beyond the scope of this singular permit application, and remains a work <br />in need of progress. Our pursuit of the requested study is an <br />acknowledgement of these limitations and in respect to the burdens the <br />OMLR must satisfy in the absence of such resolution. <br />3. The Applicant submitted a response from CGRS which states up to four wells <br />may require water augmentation as a result of dewatering activities. The <br />attached map depicting registered wells in the vicinity of the mine does not <br />sufficiently address the requested information. <br />Varra Companies, inc. correspondence of 14 April 2011 to the Colorado Office of Mined Land Reclamation 5 <br />(OMLR) in reply to OMLR correspondence of 14 March 2011 - Western Sugar Reclamation Land <br />Development Project- M-2010-049.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.