My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2011-04-07_REVISION - M1981185 (5)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Minerals
>
M1981185
>
2011-04-07_REVISION - M1981185 (5)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/15/2021 5:58:11 PM
Creation date
4/19/2011 7:33:35 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1981185
IBM Index Class Name
REVISION
Doc Date
4/7/2011
Doc Name
Phone conversation 04/06/2011 (CN-01)
From
DRMS-WHE
To
File
Type & Sequence
CN1
Email Name
WHE
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Phone Conversation with George Robinson on April 6, 2011 I 2 <br />CN-01, May Day Idaho Mine Complex, M-1981-185 <br />as part of CN-01. DRMS previously approved such proposal in the original permit <br />application for Idaho Mill, M-2006-069, which was approved but never issued and <br />ultimately withdrawn by Wildcat. <br />3. Regarding the location of an appropriate Point of Compliance (POC) for verification of <br />compliance with ground water regulations, Mr. Robinson proposed that DRMS assist in <br />determining such location. <br />DRMS responded that the existing data was insufficient to determine an appropriate <br />location for a POC. DRMS clarified that the Applicant must propose a POC for DRMS <br />review and approval. DRMS reiterated that such proposal must include sufficient data <br />to demonstrate an appropriate POC. <br />4. Regarding a potential hydrologic connection between surface flow of Little Deadwood <br />Gulch and the discharge at the pre-law and collapsed Idaho Adit, Mr. Robinson <br />proposed a tracer study. <br />DRMS staff indicated that such proposal would be considered but made no <br />commitments to accept or reject such proposal, if and when it was officially presented <br />as part of CN-01. DRMS did not encourage or discourage the tracer study. However, <br />DRMS cautioned Mr. Robinson on misinterpretation of a tracer study. <br />DRMS had previously scheduled a meeting with Wildcat Mining Corporation, to occur April 8, <br />2011. The April 6 meeting did not alter the scheduling of the meeting for April 8 <br />t" t"
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.