My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2011-02-14_PERMIT FILE - C1980007A (3)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Permit File
>
Coal
>
C1980007
>
2011-02-14_PERMIT FILE - C1980007A (3)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/13/2018 7:01:03 AM
Creation date
4/14/2011 9:10:05 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1980007A
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
2/14/2011
Doc Name
SUBSIDENCE EVALUATION
Section_Exhibit Name
Exhibit 60E Subsidence Evaluation for the South of Divide and Dry Fork Mining Areas
Media Type
D
Archive
Yes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
71
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Subsidence Evaluation for the <br />Exhibit 60E South of Divide and Dry Fork Mining Areas Page 31 <br />• 11.2 Stock Watering Ponds and U.S. Forest Service Water Resources <br />The stock watering ponds in the South of Divide and Dry Fork mining areas are located in debris <br />flows or colluvium derived from the debris flows (Dunrud 1989). A total of 26 ponds have been <br />mapped in the South of Divide mining area. Ten of these ponds are also classified as U.S. Forest <br />Service water resources. Eight stock ponds are located in the Dry Fork mining area. The debris <br />flows consist of a heterogeneous mixture of clay derived from the Wasatch Formation and <br />boulders and gravels derived primarily from the Mount Gunnison intrusive (granodiorites and <br />quartz monzanites). Based on observations made during geologic mapping in the area, these <br />debris flows are even less likely to be affected by longwall mining than the alluvium. The debris <br />flows have a very low permeability and, because the clay matrix is armored by the interstitial <br />gravel and boulders, are resistant to erosion (the Deep Creek Ditch locally flows in this material <br />at steep gradients). Based on the above - mentioned observations, no effects are expected when <br />ponds in the South of Divide and Dry Fork mining areas are undermined. The clay -rich material <br />that lines these ponds is expected to provide a seal against subsidence effects. <br />No stock watering ponds in the Apache Rocks and Box Canyon mining areas have been <br />noticeably affected when longwall mining occurred beneath them. The ponds above mined B- <br />seam longwall panels 13 -A, 15, 16, and 22 in Horse Gulch,, Sylvester Gulch (stock ponds P27 -2 <br />and P27 -3), and West Flatiron (stock pond P23 -4) respectively, showed no noticeable water level <br />change when compared to pre- mining water levels (after taking seasonal precipitation levels into <br />account). These ponds, which are located in clay -rich (Wasatch clay) material in order to <br />• minimize leakage, occur in overburden that ranges in depth from about 800 feet in Horse Gulch <br />to 2,200 feet in the stock pond P23 -4 area above the eastern end of mined B -seam longwall panel <br />22. <br />11.3 Streams and Ditches <br />A greater potential exists for longwall mine subsidence to impact streams in the South of Divide <br />and Dry Fork mining areas than in the Apache Rocks and Box Canyon mining areas. This is <br />primarily because a) the overburden depth is less than in the Apache Rocks and Box Canyon <br />mining area, particularly in the northwestern part of the area, and b) the coal extraction thickness <br />is projected to be greater for the E -seam than was mined in the B -seam (14 feet versus 12 feet). <br />Although no subsidence cracks are expected to affect streamflow in the South of Divide and Dry <br />Fork mining areas, based on prior observations in the West Elk and Somerset mine areas, it is <br />recommended that detailed subsidence and surface flow measurements be done in order to verify <br />this concept. It is recommended that measurements be conducted particularly in the <br />northwestern part of the South of Divide mining area, where coal extraction thickness is <br />projected to be a maximum of 14 feet and overburden depth ranges from 375 to 400 feet. <br />The primary streams in the South of Divide mining area are Dry Fork of Minnesota Creek, Deer <br />Creek, Poison Creek, and Lick Creek. The primary streams in the Dry Fork mining area are the <br />upper regions of Dry Fork of Minnesota Creek and Deep Creek. A primary source of water to <br />the Dry Fork and Minnesota Reservoir comes from the Deep Creek Ditch, wherein water is <br />diverted from the upper drainage of Deep Creek and transmitted to Dry Fork. The Deep Creek <br />Ditch was constructed in debris flows or colluvium and alluvium derived from the debris flow, as <br />• described in Section 11.2, this debris flow material is not expected to be impacted by longwall <br />831-032.810 Wright Water Engineers, Inc. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.