Laserfiche WebLink
CM0001767 <br />• <br />Page 13 <br />cm/sec in-place permeability. In both cases, a 10-7 cm/sec S-B cutoff wall extended from the <br />bottom of Zone 1 to the top of fractured bedrock. Use of the Mosquito Fault material in Zone 1 <br />in-place of a S-B material increased seepage approximately 50 percent or 370 gpd (i.e., <br />approximately 750 gpd versus 1,120 gpd) <br />For the evaluation of varying cutoff wall configurations, seepage through a bentonite-amended <br />soil in Zone 1 with a 10-7 cm/sec S-B cutoff wall extending from the bottom of Zone 1 to the top <br />of fractured bedrock was estimated at approximately 750 gpd. In comparison, seepage through <br />the Mosquito Fault material in Zone 1 and varying widths of Mosquito Fault material used in <br />place of the 10-7 cm/sec permeability S-B cutoff wall was evaluated. If Mosquito Fault material <br />was used in Zone 1 and a 10-foot wide Mosquito Fault cutoff wall is extended from the bottom <br />of Zone 1 to the top of fractured bedrock, seepage would increase approximately 650 gpd (i.e., to <br />approximately 1,400 gpd). If Mosquito Fault material was used in Zone 1 and a 20-foot wide <br />Mosquito Fault cutoff wall. is extended from the bottom of Zone I to the top of fractured <br />bedrock, seepage would increase approximately 350 gpd (i.e., to approximately 1,400 gpd). This <br />later evaluation also showed that if a bentonite-amended soil were used in Zone 1, total seepage <br />would be the same if either the 10-7 cm/sec S-B cutoff wall or the 20-foot wide Mosquito Fault <br />cutoff wall is extended from the bottom of Zone 1 to the top of fractured bedrock. <br />4.10 Slope Stability <br />Site operations require that water be contained on both sides of the Dam. While the Dam's <br />primary purpose is to contain the Seepwater Pond, operational logistics must include a scenario <br />where the Robinson Lake elevation is higher than the Seepwater Pond elevation, effectively <br />requiring the Dam to contain Robinson Lake. These operational considerations required <br />modeling of the Dam's stability against hydrostatic forces from both sides of the Dam. <br />The purpose of the slope stability evaluation is to determine if the Dam design is stable under <br />static and psuedostatic (i.e., dynamic earthquake loading) loading conditions. Static and <br />dynamic loads on the Dam were evaluated using the computer program GSLOPE, developed by <br />Mitre Software Corporation, to determine the critical failure surfaces based on the model <br />calculations that generate a Factor of Safety (FOS). An acceptable FOS was chosen from the <br />Rules which indicate that varying FOS's are acceptable for varying slope stability evaluations. <br />• <br />c:Vlynn%cypn Nclimm%jwldam%6104mp2.dm 12!03/96 <br />Environmental <br />