My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2011-03-14_REVISION - M1977493 (65)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Minerals
>
M1977493
>
2011-03-14_REVISION - M1977493 (65)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/15/2021 5:47:16 PM
Creation date
4/12/2011 12:35:06 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1977493
IBM Index Class Name
REVISION
Doc Date
3/14/2011
Doc Name
Exhibit List, Ex. 70
From
Climax
To
MLRB
Type & Sequence
AM6
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
34
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
CM0001766 <br />• <br />Page 12 <br />The crest surfacing was specified to provide a slip-resistant surface on top of the Dam that would <br />withstand rutting by maintenance equipment. A standard poorly-graded gravel used in road <br />surfacing should be used for the crest surface. The borrow area can not produce the estimated <br />400 cy of crest surfacing material without crushing equipment and an alternate source (e.g., <br />purchased from a commercial quarry) would likely be more cost effective. Table 4 identifies the <br />riprap and crest surfacing material quantities required as calculated in the `Summary of <br />Construction Materials Calculation Brief provided in Appendix E. <br />4.9 Seepage Analyses <br />Seepage from the Seepwater Pond through and/or underneath the Dam toward Robinson Lake <br />was estimated by use of the computer modeling software package `FastSEEP', developed by <br />Brigham Young University. FastSEEP incorporates the United States Army Corp of Engineers <br />SEEP2D flow net generation routine. Appendix C provides the data used to perform the seepage <br />analysis as well as the `Foownet Analysis of Seepage Calculation Brief. Table 5 summarizes the <br />flownet analyses results of seepage rates based on varying Zone 1 materials and cutoff wall <br />configurations, as well as the seepage rate influencing water level elevations in both Robinson <br />Lake and the Seepwater Pond. These seepage rates were estimated to aid in cost-benefit <br />evaluations, discussed in section 4.4 and 4.5, for using various options for Zone 1 and cutoff wall <br />materials, respectively. <br />All seepage evaluations conservatively assumed a low Robinson Lake elevation and varying high <br />Seepwater Pond elevations. As a baseline for comparison, seepage was evaluated using a Zone 1 <br />permeability of 10.7 cm/sec (i.e., achievable by using a bentonite-amended soil), without using a <br />cutoff wall and by varying the Seepwater Pond elevation. Seepage estimates varied between <br />approximately 9,000 and 11,000 gallons-per-day (gpd). <br />For all evaluations of varying Zone 1 and S-B cutoff wall materials and/or configurations, a 10-7 <br />centimeter-per-second (cm/sec) S-B cutoff wall was identified as extending from the top of <br />fractured bedrock to the top of competent bedrock to minimize seepage through the fractured <br />bedrock zone. <br />For the evaluation of varying Zone 1 materials, seepage was modeled using the Mosquito Fault <br />material, which has a 10-6 cm/sec permeability, in Zone 1 versus a S-B mixture with a 10-7 <br />c.Ty.%cypmlclimutkwldamX6104mp2.doc 12/01/96 <br />e = . ? . Environmental
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.