My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2011-04-05_REPORT - C1981008
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Report
>
Coal
>
C1981008
>
2011-04-05_REPORT - C1981008
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 4:32:23 PM
Creation date
4/6/2011 8:55:10 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981008
IBM Index Class Name
REPORT
Doc Date
4/5/2011
Doc Name
2010 ARR Review
From
Brock Bowles
To
Marcia Talvitie
Permit Index Doc Type
Annual Reclamation Report
Email Name
MLT
SB1
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
new set of standards were being formulated and were approved in October 2010 by the <br />Mined Land Reclamation Board in PR-6. Because of this overlap in standards and concern <br />for the quality of existing prime farmlands, I have compared the Walsh report to both sets <br />of standards and have the following questions and comments: <br />a. Topsoil sample point TS-98 was sampled and has corresponding data included in <br />the report, however, the location of TS-98 is not shown on Exhibit 2010-6 of the <br />2010 ARR. <br />b. Table 2-Subsoil Sample Results, July 15, 2010 - The percentage of allowable rock <br />fragments was exceeded in 3 of the 17 sample points (NHSS-240A, NHSS-241A <br />and NHSS-241B) with greater than 35% rock fragments. These three samples also <br />increased the overall average which, therefore exceed the allowable limit of 25% <br />according to the Soil Suitability Criteria for `Lift B and Single-Lift Soils' outlined <br />in PR-57. This was noted in the Walsh report. With the approval of PR-6, soil <br />suitability criteria was redefined with the implementation of an eight (8) block <br />system to address different soil types and post mining land uses. The three sample <br />points which exceeded the rock fragment criteria are located in Zone 7 which is <br />west of 2700 Road and north of BB Road. This area is not considered Prime <br />Farmland and no rock fragment criterion was set for this zone. When all the sample <br />points of Table 2 are separated according to the Zones established in PR-6, all the <br />sample points meet the standards listed in Table 2.05.4(2)(d)-IA and B of PR-6. <br />c. The exact position of sample NHSS-226A and B is not marked on Exhibit 2010-7, <br />therefore, it cannot be determined of it is in Zone 1 or 2. The standards for Zone 1 <br />& 2 are the same making this only a point for clarification. <br />d. The exact position of samples NHSS-237A and B is not marked on Exhibit 2010-7. <br />The sample location appears to be in Zone 3 making this only a point for <br />clarification. <br />4
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.