Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> CM0000902 <br /> O OD <br />, Ol_ <br />t ,, : Fa <br />I' N CO <br /> 3. Climax reservoir with Camp Hale groundwater <br /> recharge reservoir (Exhibit 3). ?'? <br /> <br />gyn.... <br />C9 W <br /> 4. Mixed Climax and Lower Homestake reservoirs v W =- <br />_; <br />' .. (Exhibit 4). <br />a <br />. w - <br />m <br /> B. Ruedi Reservoir Alternative z w <br />J; <br /> In addition to the four alternatives identified above, ° N <br />1 interest has been expressed by certain parties in 0 <br /> undertaking a preliminary analysis of the feasibility P a>, <br /> of an alternative that utilizes a pump back from Ruedi O <br /> Reservoir to the Boustead Tunnel. That analysis will C .. <br /> be performed. The parties agree to further discuss not ?, . <br /> only the feasibility of such an alternative, but <br />f whether it can appropriately serve as a substitute for <br />?:.. the remaining alternatives. <br />1 C. Scope of.Study. <br /> 1. Hydrology (yield). The parties have prepared a <br /> spreadsheet model of the upper Eagle River basin <br /> to simulate operations of selected project <br />4 components. The model uses daily streamflow <br /> records from key gages to estimate divertible <br />F streamflows at.numerous points in the basin. The <br />t.., "Study Period" is 1945 through 1994 (50 years). <br />Specifically, the hydrological investigations will <br />include: <br />a. Defining desirable projects and demand <br />patterns for the parties and identifying <br />project yields. <br />b. Modifying the operations model to reflect <br />various demand patterns by the parties and to <br />reflect the project configurations. <br />C. Estimating the yield of various project <br />configurations. The yields will be used to <br />compare`` project costs. `` II {{ II ((IIII II <br />I I'?IfI ??I?I I'll?ll'll{ ('I?I ?1'II? II"I III'?{lill'I I?'I <br />666203 08/17/1998 03:10P 23 Sara Fisher <br />z:\1ega1\mtP\water\aur-c82.mou 23 of 112 R 561.00 D 0.00 N 0.00 Eagle CO <br />2