Laserfiche WebLink
X <br />• Upon submission of the either TR, the Objectors can elect to file a petition <br />requesting a hearing under Rule 1.7, which the Division shall set. The issues to <br />be heard at that hearing will be limited to those raised in the Rule 1.7 petition. <br />• The Operator shall waive the requirement, under Rule 1.9.1, that the Division act <br />on the TRs within 30 days to allow sufficient time for review, comment, and any <br />required modifications. <br />• Objectors shall be given at least 30 calendar days, commencing on receipt of each <br />TR, to review and provide comments. <br />• The Division shall review each TR, review and consider all technical comments <br />submitted, and determine the final composition of the TR to be approved and <br />incorporated into the permit within 60 days of the receipt of the submittal. <br />• The Division shall not approve the EPP TR or the Water Plan TR and shall not <br />provide a recommendation to the Board on the EPP TR or the Water Plan TR <br />until it has reviewed the Objectors' timely submitted comments. <br />• Following the Objectors' timely submission of comments, the Division shall <br />review the adequacy of the Financial Warranty, in light of those comments, as <br />provided in Rule 4.2.1(2). <br />• In the event that the Objectors oppose the Division's approval of the EPP TR or <br />the Water Plan TR, the Division's recommendations to the Board concerning the <br />same, or the adequacy of the Financial Warranty, they must submit a petition for a <br />MLRB hearing pursuant to Rule 1.4.11. At that time, if a Formal Public Hearing <br />has not been convened as a result of a Rule 1.7 petition, such a hearing will be <br />convened to allow the Board to consider the merits of the Technical Revision, and <br />to hear testimony from the objecting parties. <br />43839