My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2011-03-24_REVISION - C1981012
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Coal
>
C1981012
>
2011-03-24_REVISION - C1981012
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 4:32:02 PM
Creation date
3/28/2011 8:00:23 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981012
IBM Index Class Name
REVISION
Doc Date
3/24/2011
Doc Name
Adequacy Review Letter
From
DRMS
To
New Elk Coal Company, LLC
Type & Sequence
TR56
Email Name
KAG
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
9. Please define edge offset. The analysis provided indicates that edge offset <br />was estimated using SDPS guidelines based on panel width and depth of <br />workings. <br />10. No indication of panel width was provided in the subsidence analysis in <br />Exhibit 24. Please provide panel width and indicate the vertical projection of <br />the mined area used in the analysis in Figures 1 and 2. <br />11. No estimate of angle of draw was noted in Exhibit 24. If the complement <br />angle to the angle of influence can be assumed to be the angle of draw, <br />(23.8 degrees) at 450 feet in depth, the projection of measureable <br />subsidence would project outward 198 feet from the vertical projection of the <br />edge of the workings at the surface. If a 300 foot square pillar is used to <br />protect gas wells, and the well is centered in the 300 foot square, 198 feet <br />would intercept the gas well casing in the subsurface from all sides <br />assuming mining and subsidence on all sided of the protective square pillar. <br />In fact, if mining was to occur on all sides, no portion of the surface would be <br />spared from subsidence for the gas wells. This protective pillar area does <br />not appear to be large enough to protect gas wells from possible casing <br />rupture or other damage. Please review Exhibit 24 with regard to <br />subsidence control for the gas wells. <br />12. In permit text narrative, define the term "pillar retreat line" and show in a <br />figure or cross-section how this "line" relates to surface features when used <br />in the context of a subsidence control plan. <br />13. The paved road mitigation plan states visual monitoring should be <br />performed on the roads weekly beginning when retreat operations are within <br />a 40 degree vertical offset angle." The Division understands that no retreat <br />mining will occur from mining in the Allen seam in Section 13, 14, 23, and 24 <br />of T33S R68W. This would preclude subsidence of Highway 12, the <br />Purgatoire River, and any structures or residences in the described area. <br />Please explain and/or correct the subsidence control plan as necessary. <br />14. Subsidence survey, mitigation, and control plan information is found in two <br />locations within the revised materials; on pages 2.05-90g to 2.05-93 and in <br />Exhibit 24 (revised1/12/11). Please consider consolidating this information <br />in one location in the permit application. <br />15. Permit text narrative on page 2.05-90g states that structures are shown on <br />Map 20 sheets 1-3 and Maps 11 and 12. Please indicate where a listing of <br />all the structures and renewable resources is located along with a brief <br />description of each. [Rule 2.05.6(6)(a)(ii)] . <br />16. With regard to mining proposed under TR-56, please state what structures if <br />any, will be undermined and/or affected by subsidence. Permit text narrative
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.