Laserfiche WebLink
C-1982-057 TR-73 <br />Engineering-Geotech PAR <br />24-Mar-2011 <br />Page 3 of 5 <br />• Man-made fill materials (clay, topsoil and rock fragments), placed during reclamation, <br />were encountered to a depth of 19'. The fill materials were typically very soft to loose, <br />and dry to wet. <br />Conclusions and recommendations for repair of the landslide begin on NWCC page 5. <br />Saturation of upper reclaimed fills by perched groundwater at former access ramp fill is <br />the likely failure mechanism; upper fills were placed loosely, and have since become <br />saturated <br />Groundwater will be captured upslope and within the failure, and directed away from <br />failed materials <br />Regrading the remainder of the slide (uphill) to more stable configuration cannot be <br />done until existing fill materials are dewatered <br />Q i ! ill 1111 Y <br />, 111111111111 11111111 A <br />I ... , 1 <br />a. Although not stated directly, the NWCC report seems to imply that relocated Channels <br />PM-2A and PM-2 will now serve the dual purposes of transport of surface water runoff <br />and interception of subsurface water that is flowing into and out of the shrub plot <br />landslide. Please verify that this is or is not the intent of the proposed plan. <br />b. Construction of PM-2 across the toe of the shrub plot landslide may contribute to <br />additional loss of stability in the slide mass due to the removal of any materials now <br />acting as a buttress. Subsequent downhill movement of the mass could encroach upon <br />the PM-2 channel and create a damming effect. Please address the possibility of this <br />scenario occurring. <br />The current application does not propose the construction of any ditches or channels to <br />divert surface or subsurface flow away from the eastern two-thirds of the shrub plot <br />landslide. While regrading the area is not yet feasible, would installation of a cutoff <br />channel be possible with TR-73? <br />Exhibit 20-D.2 Sheet 1 Pond 016 Area Remediation Plan and Road Profile <br />�i I JIMI j I ) I I I <br />a. Page I of the text states that the new road will be approximately 20 feet wide. Please <br />add a typical section for the road to this map, showing the proposed configuration for <br />both cut and fill situations, with roadside ditches and proposed surfacing material and <br />thickness. <br />b. The Division was unable to find details with the TR-73 application that describe how <br />the road will be constructed to comply with the requirements of Section 4.03.2 — Access <br />Roads. Please provide the details and required commitments, or direct the Division to <br />the place in the current permit where these items are already addressed. <br />c. A vertical profile is provided beneath the plan view. The profile is drawn with both <br />horizontal and vertical scales at 1"=100'. Please modify the vertical scale to be I"=20', <br />and add elevation levels at each VP1. <br />