My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2011-03-18_REVISION - C1994082
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Coal
>
C1994082
>
2011-03-18_REVISION - C1994082
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 4:31:52 PM
Creation date
3/21/2011 10:57:38 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1994082
IBM Index Class Name
REVISION
Doc Date
3/18/2011
Doc Name
Revised Report for Evaluation Procedures For Testing Reclamation
From
Seneca Coal Company
To
DRMS
Type & Sequence
SL3
Email Name
SLB
SB1
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
106
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
table value for alpha error probability of .20, with (n-1) degrees of freedom then Ho would be <br />rejected, and revegetation would be deemed successful. <br />Were the mean allowable herbaceous cover of an adequate sample from the 2010 Phase II BRB <br />less than 90% of the cover standard (see above), then a one-sample t-test would be made in the <br />following form to test the hypothesis of reclamation success for cover (CDMG 2005 revised rule, <br />4.15.11 (2)(b)): <br />t A X <br />S- <br />x <br />Where: x = Bond Release Block Sample Mean <br />Q = 90% of Standard <br />S- = Standard error of mean [ s / In- ] <br />Y <br />S = Sample standard deviation <br />n = Sample size <br />tc = Calculated t value <br />tt =Tablet value (alpha= 0.1) see Rohlf and Sokal (1969) <br />The (traditional) null hypothesis being tested would be that the bond release block mean (µ) was <br />greater than or equal to 90% of the standard, stated as Ho: µ >_ Q. If t. was less than or equal to <br />the 1-tailed t table value for alpha error probability of 0.10, at (n-1) degrees of freedom, then Ho <br />was not rejected, and revegetation was deemed successful. <br />Climatic Data <br />Precipitation data were collected at the nearby Seneca IIW Mine during the period 1990 through <br />2010. Since the data record for Seneca IIW exists for only a relatively short period, the long term <br />average monthly precipitation data from the Western Regional Climate Center (WRCC) for the <br />nearby town of Hayden (57 years) was used as an appropriate base for comparison. Information <br />on degree-days was based on temperature data from met station 2 at the Seneca IIW Mine.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.