My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2010-11-16_PERMIT FILE - C1996083A (27)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Permit File
>
Coal
>
C1996083A
>
2010-11-16_PERMIT FILE - C1996083A (27)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 4:27:00 PM
Creation date
3/16/2011 8:24:12 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1996083A
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
11/16/2010
Doc Name
After 1996
Section_Exhibit Name
Volume III Exhibit 09 Wildlife
Media Type
D
Archive
Yes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
134
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />The greatest abundance of songbirds and other bird species was observed at this site. <br />Common mergansers, ringneck ducks, mallards, cinnamon teal, yellow warblers, red- <br />winged and Brewer's blackbirds, cowbirds, tree and bank swallows, orioles, towhees, <br />mourning doves, crows, northern flickers, downy woodpeckers, indigo buntings, house <br />sparrows, house wrens, magpies, turkey vultures, kestrels, western and eastern kingbirds <br />and robins were observed in this area. <br />Recommendations: The area south of the existing fine should be totally left alone. <br />Impacts in this area could trigger Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act consultation. <br />Although no southwest willow flycatchers were heard or observed, it is potemial habitat. <br />A portion of these wetlands is mitigation for the Highway 133 project built in the 1980's <br />by the Colorado Department of Transportation. Based on the location map, there should <br />not be any impact on this area. Cut and fill materials should be stabilized and utilized on <br />site or hauled to other project sites to prevent erosion into the wetlands south of this area. <br />Maintenance of all existing vegetation, if possible, should be retained or replaced as <br />buffers due to the close proximity of human constructed features as noted above. <br />Reclamation efforts should include control of invasive, noxious weeds in the disturbance <br />areas along the entire corridor. Weed control should occur for a minimum of five years <br />after the disturbed areas are reclaimed. <br />• During the engineering survey for the final siding alignment, it would be a good~idea to <br />have someone with biological expertise available to provide input on avoiding or <br />minimizing impacts on sensitive wildlife habitats within the condor. There is great <br />potential for minimizing and mitigating impacts during the construction phase that is not <br />pointed out in this wildlife survey report. Much of this work can be incorporated into the <br />design and have minimal implementation costs. <br />SUMMARY <br />In summary, none of the wildlife species on the state and federal sensitive, threatened or <br />endangered lists were observed during the field surveys. Probability for occurrence <br />based on suitable habitat for any of the listed species was only found for the southwest <br />willow flycatcher. This habitat was found on the southeastern fringe of the survey radius <br />and is well buffered by vegetation and topography from the disturbance site. There is no <br />reason to believe that construction of the siding will impact this habitat. <br />• <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.