My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2011-02-28_PERMIT FILE - M2010075 (2)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Permit File
>
Minerals
>
M2010075
>
2011-02-28_PERMIT FILE - M2010075 (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 4:31:16 PM
Creation date
3/2/2011 2:08:04 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M2010075
IBM Index Class Name
PERMIT FILE
Doc Date
2/28/2011
Doc Name
New Response
From
Randy Schafer
To
DRMS
Email Name
MAC
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
14
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
the nature of this disturbance, including the approximate dimensions of any pit <br />walls as required by Rule 6.3.3(f). Also, please indicate if the disturbance is the <br />result of mining. <br />The pit, as originally submitted, does cross an area previously disturbed. Mr. Lanny <br />Payne, current land owner, stated that material was taken from the site many years ago, <br />probably before the state requirements for reclamation permits. Pit walls in the <br />previously disturbed area range from being vertical to a slope of 2H. •I V. <br />9. The Mining Plan states excavation will stop at least one foot above the static <br />groundwater level. At least two feet of native material should be left over the <br />groundwater table. Please commit excavating no closer than two feet above the <br />static groundwater level. <br />The Applicant will commit to excavating no closer than two feet above the static <br />groundwater level. <br />10. The Mining Plan states limited processing may occur. Please describe the <br />nature of processing as required by Rule 6.3.3(m). <br />Don Riemenshnieder has indicated that no processing will occur at the site. <br />11. The Mining Plan Map shows the top of the east pit wall is immediately adjacent <br />to County Road XX. Will the Operator maintain a setback from County Road XX? <br />Washington County is going to maintain a 1 S foot setback from Co. Rd. XX. <br />6.3.4 Exhibit D - Reclamation Plan <br />12. The Applicant has stated the site will be seeded according to NRCS <br />recommendations. The Division generally concurs with the seeding <br />recommendations of NRCS; however, the permit application did not contain their <br />recommendations. Please provide the Division with the following information as <br />required by Rule 6.3.4(1) (c) (ii)-(v): <br />ii. Explain how the seedbed will be prepared to eliminate compacted <br />conditions. State the type, application rate, and soil incorporation methods <br />of fertilizer application, if any. <br />The recommended seeding plan from the Washington County NRCS Office was <br />previously provided. The recommendation calls for planting a cover crop of <br />Sterile Sorghum that would be drilled at a rate of 2.23 lbs/acre. The site would be <br />worked to prepare a proper seed bed before the cover crop was seeded.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.