Laserfiche WebLink
Yoast Mine SL-3 February 2011 <br />Phase ll Bond Release Request <br />• Table 2. Sample Adequacy Summary for Total All Hit Cover, Phase H Bond Release <br />Block and Extended Reference Area (ERA), Yoast Mine. <br />Area Total All Hit Cover (x) s N nm;n t <br />Phase 11 Bond Release 1 <br />30 <br />Block 57.7 15.6 35 12 . <br />7 <br />Aspen ERA 159.1 19.4 15 3 1.34 <br /> 5 <br />Mountain Brush ERA 117.7 19.7 16 5 1.34 <br /> 1 <br />Sagebrush ERA 66.7 14.0 17 8 1.33 <br /> 7 <br />Steep Mountain Brush .34 <br /> 43.5 11 <br />8 15 13 <br /> . 5 <br />E <br />Table 3. Sample Adequacy Summary for Allowable All Hit Herbaceous Cover, Phase II <br />Bond Release Block and Extended Reference Area (ERA), Yoast Mine. <br />Area Allowable All Hit <br />Herbaceous Cover x s N nmfn t <br />Phase II Bond Release Block 42.97 15.9 35 24 1.307 <br />Aspen ERA 87.3 21.1 15 11 1.345 <br />Mountain Brush ERA 40.6 11.2 16 14 1.341 <br />Sagebrush ERA 35.8 10.1 17 15 1.337 <br />Steep Mountain Brush ERA 17.5 5.0 15 15 1.345 <br />Sample point locations for the 2010 vegetation sampling used in the Phase II bond release <br />evaluation study are shown on Maps 1 and 2 of the 2010 Yoast Mine vegetation monitoring <br />report (February 2011) prepared by ESCO Associates and included in Attachment XX. <br />The revegetation success evaluations determined that the mean allowable all hit herbaceous <br />cover in the Phase II bond release block was less than the cover standard (described <br />previously). Since the cover sampling met sample adequacy after a minimum of 15 samples <br />were collected, statistical testing using a one-sample t-test was made using the following <br />equation to test the hypothesis of reclamation success for cover (CDRMS 2005 revised rule, <br />4.15.11 (2)(b)): <br />t - Q-x <br />S- <br />x <br />Where: x = Bond Release Block Sample Mean <br />• Q = 90% of Standard <br />Sx = Standard error of mean [ s / NIn <br />S = Sample standard deviation <br />6