My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2011-02-02_REVISION - M1981185
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Minerals
>
M1981185
>
2011-02-02_REVISION - M1981185
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/15/2021 5:58:07 PM
Creation date
2/22/2011 1:55:04 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1981185
IBM Index Class Name
REVISION
Doc Date
2/2/2011
Doc Name
Objection to CN-01 & complaint against staff
From
Phil Vigil
To
DRMS-Loretta Pineda
Type & Sequence
CN1
Email Name
WHE
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
addressing my request- Perhaps it was your phone call that put it on the fast-track. In my <br />opinion, Wally should have responded to my request for the application on the 19'° or <br />sent someone else to verify the application was in fact there. <br />Wally's response was that the application was there on the 26a' and his statement that <br />it was available on the 19'h is false and unacceptable. I find it inappropriate and <br />personally offensive to be portrayed by Wally as alleging the application was there and I <br />was not telling the truth. <br />I would like to request a written apology for this poor choice of words and a <br />correction to Wally's false report. <br />Time and time again in the processing of Wildcat's application, the DRMS response <br />to citizens requests and complaints has been delayed and the response questionable from <br />my perspective. These delayed responses have allowed Wildcat Mining Corp. to ignore <br />DRMS regulations with the knowledge that DBMS staff will not be coming any time <br />soon. I believe these delayed responses from DRMS have been very costly in both time <br />and money. It has allowed a permit that was fairly simple and limited to explode into a <br />very complicated and expensive one for the people of Colorado. I would also like to <br />request a formal audit of the Wildcat Mining Corporations activity and the Division's <br />actions back to 2006. It appears Wildcat Mining does not have any violations prior to <br />2009. During the summer of 2006 Wildcat Mining constructed a mine site that included <br />a processing plant, rock crusher, excavation of old tailing ponds and road construction. <br />They did not even have an application on file at that time. Was there no violations <br />recorded because there were no citizen complaints? I know the DRMS Environmental <br />Specialists; Kate Pickford was on site more than once. In fact one memorable visit was <br />when Kate Pickford was riding around in the applicant's pickup and they were actually <br />ticketed by the United State Forest Service Ranger for driving their pickup off road on <br />National Forest land. Kate's behavior did nothing to encourage my hope that DRMS <br />employees were interested in protecting the local surrounding environment. <br />I have reviewed legislative declaration in section 34-32-102 for mining in the state of <br />Colorado. This mandate defines mining and reclamation to be both "necessary and <br />proper." While I won't argue it being "necessary," I do question groper" in this case. <br />Wildcat Mining Corporation's approach to mining in Colorado has been anything but
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.