My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2011-02-02_REVISION - M1981185
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Minerals
>
M1981185
>
2011-02-02_REVISION - M1981185
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/15/2021 5:58:07 PM
Creation date
2/22/2011 1:55:04 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1981185
IBM Index Class Name
REVISION
Doc Date
2/2/2011
Doc Name
Objection to CN-01 & complaint against staff
From
Phil Vigil
To
DRMS-Loretta Pineda
Type & Sequence
CN1
Email Name
WHE
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
RECEIV <br />FEB 18 2011 <br />Division of Reclamation, <br />Mining and Safaty <br />January 31, 2011 <br />0t3?ec.i/on -to C N -o i <br />C'oMP Ctint C- CLIAC, S <br />°`Y ?a7 J??ko Ar-f- ?MPtex -'° <br />M- t qe l - t85 ?-'`? <br />Philip and Leslie Vigil <br />4719 County Road 124 <br />Hesperus, Colorado 81326 <br />(970) 385-4479 <br />RF QFl <br />AFB 0 .7 2 VAc <br />1 <br />n/n9 a?a s C o <br />fy , <br />Colorado Division of Reclamation, Mining and Safety <br />Director; Loretta Pineda <br />1313 Sherman Street, Room 215 <br />Denver, Colorado 80203 <br />Dear Loretta Pineda, <br />Re: Mayday Idaho Mine Complex <br />CDRMS File: M-1981-185 <br />I first want to thank you for taking the time to talk to me last week. This letter is in <br />response to a letter dated 1/26/11 that I received from Wallace Erickson at the DRMS <br />office in Durango, Co. Wally has alleged that I was not telling the truth about Wildcat <br />Mining Corporations application being available to me on the 19th of January, 2011 at the <br />La Plata County Clerks office. <br />I can assure you I was there and the only Wildcat application made available to me <br />were the old 110 permits. I called Wally that day and asked for his assistance in locating <br />and identifying the 112 permit applications and I'm sorry to say Wally was not much <br />help. He asked me to send a letter, which I did. I did not hear anything for a week <br />despite leaving a couple of phone messages. I again, called three other times and didn't <br />leave messages because it seemed to me Wally was not going to answer and that I was <br />wasting my time leaving messages. i finally called you on the 20h of January and that <br />afternoon received a call from Wally that basically called me "confused" and the <br />application was there. He did not provide any details or helpful information for me to <br />understand why it was not there on the 19t' <br />From a citizen's perspective, I find Wally's response to my need for access to the <br />application to be indicative of the way this application has been processed. <br />To begin with, why did it take Wally a week to check on the application? It would <br />have taken Wally less than 10 minutes to drive down there and verify compliance. <br />Instead I assume Wally followed DRMS guidelines, and allowed a week to pass before
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.