Laserfiche WebLink
However, Meehan Draw, Glasier Draw and Nygren Draw are located within the permit area <br />and have recorded flows. Please explain and modify the text if necessary. <br />6. Under Rule 2.04.7(2) and referring to Map 2.04.7-1 and Table 2.04.7-5 on page 17 of Section <br />2.04.7, please explain why Nygren Draw does not have any operational surface water <br />monitoring sites, since it passes through the permit area. <br />7. In Table 2.04.7-5 on page 17 of Section 2.04.7, surface water monitoring stations SW-N201 <br />and SW-N208 are listed for the 2nd Park sub lateral. However, this sub lateral does not appear <br />on Map 2.04.7-1. Please explain. In addition, are all of the irrigation ditches and their branches <br />shown on the map? <br />8. In the "Effects of Mining on the Permit Area Geomorphology" section on page 23 of Section <br />2.04.7, mention is made of Chiles Draw. This draw does not appear on Map 2.04.7-1. Is this <br />draw supposed to be Glasier Draw? <br />9. On page 21 of the Probable Hydrologic Consequences discussion of Section 2.04.7, it is stated <br />that the 2°d Park Lateral irrigation ditch water will be put into a pipeline and diverted around <br />the mine site. After mining, the original ditch would be reestablished. Please point out which <br />maps show the proposed location of the pipeline. <br />10. Please provide documentation that the irrigation water users approve of the plan to relocate the <br />2nd Park Lateral irrigation ditch. Is this irrigation ditch the same as the Colorado Cooperative <br />Company's ditch? Please revise the permit text to make this clearer. Finally, please provide a <br />copy of the CCC Ditch Relocation Report that is missing from Appendix 2.05.3(3)-4. <br />11. As required under Rule 2.05.3(4)(a)(i)(B), Rule 2.05.3(4)(a)(ii)(A) and Rule 2.10(2), please <br />provide a statement certified by a registered professional engineer that the general and detailed <br />hydrology designs and maps were prepared by or under the direction of a registered <br />professional engineer. <br />12. As required under Rule 2.05.3(4)(a)(i)(B) and Rule 2.10(2), please provide certified cross <br />sections of each sediment pond, oriented both lengthwise and widthwise and which include <br />each primary discharge structure. <br />13. The permit text contains two different Probable Hydrologic Consequences discussions, one in <br />Section 2.04.7 of Volume 1 and one in Section 2.05.6(3) of Volume 2. In order to avoid <br />confusion and since the PHC requirement is under Rule 2.05.6(3), the Division requests that <br />one PHC discussion be presented and that it be located in Section 2.05.6(3). <br />14. Map 2.04.7-1 and Map 2.05.3(3)-1 show several surface water bodies within the permit area. <br />However, there is no discussion of these water bodies in the Site Specific Surface Water <br />Information section or in the Probable Hydrologic Consequences section of Section 2.04.7 and <br />2.05.6(3). Please revise the appropriate permit text under Rule 2.04.7(2)(a) to include a <br />description, including ownership and use, of these water bodies. Depending on their use, Rule <br />2.04.7(3), requiring alternate water supply information, may be applicable and these water <br />2