Laserfiche WebLink
• being frozen solid, which might adversely affect the quality testing of <br />the coal. <br />• Are analyses of physical composites required? Can incremental ply data be <br />used to model composites instead? Is there sufficient analytical data on <br />physical composites to warrant not analysing any more? <br />• Status: Under Review. CCC consulting geologists are reviewing how <br />physical composites are analyzed and which tests are required. Much <br />of the 2004 analyzes were needed to provide an adequate baseline of <br />comprehensive coal quality across the Collom area. Fewer composite <br />samples will be collected in the Collom Phase 1 & 2 areas in 2005. <br />Conversely, composite samples of comprehensive analytical suites will <br />be collected in the southern part of Collom Phase 4 to increase the <br />baseline of the lower seams (I, J, K and L). <br />• BTU. Plot moisture vs BTU /1b by seam. <br />• Status: In Progress. Detailed review of the 2004 quality data is being <br />performed in conjunction with ASG reviews. <br />• ASG Issues <br />• Status: In Progress. CCC geologists are currently compiling data and results <br />with respect to ASG. The findings of this work will be presented under <br />separate cover. <br />o ASG. Plot ASG by seam. <br />o Check ASG at the SGS laboratory by re- submitting a set of ±50 samples that <br />SGS will re- analyse for ASG. <br />o Should a selected number of, say 100, samples be analysed for Relative <br />Density (by ASTM methods) rather than ASG? <br />• Data Entry/Transfer Procedures: <br />o CCC should develop a set of written data entry /transfer procedures before <br />the next resource update is started. <br />o Status: Complete. Data Entry, review and validation procedures have <br />been outlined. The data entry protocols have been included as <br />Appendix 2 of this memorandum. Data transfer protocols have been <br />included as Appendix 3 of this memorandum. <br />r � <br />U <br />