My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2010-12-17_REVISION - C1981019 (153)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Coal
>
C1981019
>
2010-12-17_REVISION - C1981019 (153)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 4:28:04 PM
Creation date
12/30/2010 10:50:25 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981019
IBM Index Class Name
REVISION
Doc Date
12/17/2010
Doc Name
Exhibit 7 Item 21 Collom Project Pre-Feasibility Hdyrology Report
Type & Sequence
PR3
Email Name
JRS
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
150
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Executive summary iii <br />South of the proposed mine, water levels are perched in the units down to the F/G coal <br />sequence. Groundwater conditions in the southern part of the proposed Collom Mine <br />are expected to be similar to those observed at the Colowyo Mine. The separate water <br />tables merge and the heads starts to rise above the water bearing units towards the <br />center of the mine. At the north edge of the proposed pit, the heads in the <br />F/G sequence down to the H sandstone are 200 to 400 ft above their respective water <br />bearing units. Groundwater gradients in the perched zones range from 0.3 to 0.12, but <br />decrease to approximately 0.03 in the northern part of the proposed mine. Groundwater <br />discharge appears to occur laterally into the valley fill within the stream drainages where <br />the streams cut through the synclinal axis. <br />The vertical extent of the groundwater system relevant to the Collom Mine appears to be <br />defined by the KM, a 4 -ft thick clay layer with very low vertical permeability. The KM <br />acts as an aquiclude, effectively separating the units containing the Collom deposit from <br />the lower units of the Williams Fork Formation and Trout Creek Sandstone. <br />Groundwater quality in the Williams Fork Formation is characterized by slightly alkaline <br />pHs and TDS ranging from 500 to 1,000 mg /I. Groundwater quality is generally good, <br />with only occasional and very slight exceedances of drinking water criteria for iron and <br />manganese. <br />Hydraulic testing of the valley fill wells show a wide range of hydraulic conductivities with <br />C a geometric mean of 3.3 ft/day. In the upstream reaches, surface water infiltrates into <br />the valley fill during the spring runoff period. Some of the valley fill groundwater may <br />recharge the bedrock units while the balance flows into the lower valley fill. <br />Groundwater stored in the valley fill is a source of stream baseflow after the spring <br />runoff, as well as the source of springs. In the downstream reaches, the bedrock units <br />appear to discharge to the valley fill, particularly in the vicinity of the north limb of the <br />syncline. Discharge to the valley fill augments base flow to the stream channels. <br />Dewatering of the mine pit as it advances below the water table and depressurization of <br />the surrounding slopes were evaluated. Dewatering plans were developed for two <br />different mine plans. The original mine plan (Option 1) involves a box cut on the north <br />side of the site and mining from north to south. Option 2 starts in the perched units on <br />the south side and progresses downdip to the south. <br />Initial slope stability analyses for Option 1 indicated that excess pore water pressures in <br />the pit slopes would result in unstable slope conditions. WMC conducted numerical 2D <br />groundwater modeling to evaluate potential slope depressurization measures that could <br />be implemented to improve slope stability. These measures include vertical wells, <br />vertical drains, horizontal drains, and natural drainage to in -pit sumps. The model <br />considered potential well spacing, dewatering rates, and the timeframe necessary to <br />achieve depressurization. Results of the model showed that wells installed to depths of <br />100 to 150 ft below the planned bottom of the mine, at 1,000 -ft spacing intervals, could <br />effectively depressurize the pit slopes. The preliminary plans also describe well <br />distribution and construction, pumping schedules, pumping rates, and mine water <br />management for both mine plan options. A preliminary plan was also prepared to <br />address spoils drainage for Option 2. <br />2572 -R2 Colowyo Coal Company <br />Water Management Consultants <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.