My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2010-12-29_REPORT - M1988044
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Report
>
Minerals
>
M1988044
>
2010-12-29_REPORT - M1988044
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 4:28:22 PM
Creation date
12/30/2010 8:03:41 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1988044
IBM Index Class Name
REPORT
Doc Date
12/29/2010
Doc Name
2010 404 Permit Annual Report
From
Mark A. Heifner
To
DRMS
Email Name
JLE
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
46
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
shift the storm track to the north and keeps the east side of the Rocky Mountains in a predominant <br />northwest, downslope flow, dry and warm winter days will continue to be common. Current <br />predictions regarding 2011 indicate a continued La Nina impact until summer. Although confidence <br />in predictions is low that far into the future, based on past patterns the La Nina is likely to subside by <br />next summer with a return to more neutral El Nino/La Nina conditions well into the autumn of 2011. <br />Beyond that, anybody's guess is as good as anybody else's guess. Whether this will translate into <br />intense snowfall on the east side of the Rocky Mountains come February, March, and perhaps April <br />is far too precise to suit the extent of our knowledge of these controlling phenomena. If it follows a <br />typical pattern, then late winter snow should increase, but with shifting in the entire global climate in <br />progress there is some question as to whether the past is all that good of a predictor of the future <br />anymore. That said, global climate changes have so far not been so intense that it would render the <br />application of past patterns on the near future hopeless. <br />The overall effect of the moisture surplus from late 2009 resulted in strong grass growth in <br />the uplands at the Lowry Range. But the drying during the summer took some toll on the stream <br />corridor vegetation with declining vigor in the cottonwood forest and some early yellowing of the <br />leaves on the weaker tree branches. Late summer moisture helped attenuate this negative effect, but a <br />moderate amount of impact on wetland vigor nevertheless occurred. That said, no stream corridor <br />vegetation was in any danger of dying out as there was still a fairly good supply of ground water to <br />maintain the vegetation. The primary effect was a reduced growth rate compared to what would have <br />probably occurred if there had been a strong monsoon in 2010. <br />Weed Control Issues: Leafy spurge remains the dominant noxious weed throughout the site, but <br />the strong grass growth in the spring of 2010 certainly knocked it back a bit more. It can still be <br />found in essentially every habitat on the site except reclaimed mined land, upland sand near mining <br />sites, and in the wetlands along the stream. Its abundance though appears to show a slow decline in <br />most habitats. <br />As was noted in previous reports, with the increased growth of grasses due to the removal of <br />grazing the spurge continued to decline in density throughout the area. It is still a fairly robust and <br />tenacious growth, but with better management the spurge is not as strong as it was previously and <br />that strength gain among the grasses seems to continue the decline in spurge. Continued control <br />measures are having the desired effect of further reducing the spurge, but there is still a great deal to <br />be done to bring the spurge population down to a reasonable level. Although no quantitative data <br />were collected, visual inspection showed that in 2010 spurge continued its decline as natives gained <br />more ground in the early part of the season. Although it might be thought that spurge gained ground <br />again later in the summer when drier conditions came, the fact is it did not. Most of the grass growth <br />for the year peaked well before the drying weather and was therefore not negatively affected. <br />However, the spurge suffered considerably during the summer due to a lack of moisture during the <br />2010 Annual Report Coal Creek Wetland Mitigation Permit DA 198811488 Page 3
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.