My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2010-12-17_REVISION - C1981019 (108)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Coal
>
C1981019
>
2010-12-17_REVISION - C1981019 (108)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 4:28:02 PM
Creation date
12/29/2010 4:19:17 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981019
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
12/17/2010
Doc Name
Rule 2.05 Operation and Reclamation Plans
Type & Sequence
PR3
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
43
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
RULE 2 PERMITS <br />5) the target post- mining land use. In this manner, reclamation and resultant developing communities will <br />be encouraged to follow a more natural path to maturation and successional progression as opposed to <br />more historically utilized grassland favorable approaches that should only be applied to the remaining <br />60% to 80% of reclaimed ground (sloping areas). However, there will likely be instances, if not an <br />overall need, to incorporate managerial practices to encourage or protect positive recruitment to the shrub <br />populations. Such management may include the following steps: <br />• Use of elevated quantities of sagebrush seed within the grassland target areas, and placement <br />of that seed in a manner to encourage sagebrush emergence. <br />• Use of limited livestock (cattle) grazing to select against grasses and for shrubs and forbs. <br />• Use of elk -proof fencing to preclude access into large blocks of maturing shrub populations, <br />especially core areas. <br />• Use of hunting pressure to reduce elk utilization of new reclamation where it can be <br />incorporated in a safe manner given proximity to active mining. Develop special seasons in <br />concert with CDOW for management of "refuge" elk. For obvious reasons, any activity in <br />this regard would have to be designed and approved for implementation in accordance with <br />applicable statutes. Furthermore, approvals from appropriate agencies (CDOW, MSHA, etc.) <br />will be obtained as necessary. <br />• Use of orchard grass (Dactylis glomerata) in key reclamation locations to encourage elk away <br />from maturing shrub populations. It has been documented that this taxon is heavily utilized <br />by foraging elk. <br />• Implement procedures for micro - habitat development whereby snow catchment is encouraged <br />and shrub heavy mixes can be applied. <br />• Interseeding of shrubs (as necessary as a normal husbandry practice) within areas not <br />exhibiting satisfactory establishment of shrubs, but still presenting opportunities (micro - <br />niches) for shrubs. Such interseeding would be performed in accordance with Rule <br />4.15.7(5)(g), and documentation of any such efforts would be provided in the Annual <br />Reclamation Report for that year. <br />Application of PERA includes management and revegetation specifications (e.g., shrub species in the <br />seed mix) for use on the "grassland" targeted areas that will facilitate additional shrub establishment when <br />climatic or other conditions are favorable. In this manner, small and/or scattered patches of additional <br />shrubland may be established that will provide improved habitat diversity, especially for sage grouse. <br />However, since this type of reclamation is entirely dependent on the vagaries of nature, dependence upon <br />such techniques cannot be relied upon. <br />Where shrublands evolve on reclaimed lands, they will be segregated into "core" areas and "ecotonal" <br />areas (as is typically evident in nature), each with a separate woody plant density success criterion but <br />both counting as "shrubland ". Ecotonal areas are those areas that exhibit shrub - conducive habitat <br />conditions (e.g., thin grass cover, skeletal soils, etc.), but have not as yet developed the more elevated <br />densities of "core" areas. It has been noted repeatedly in the reclamation industry that the 10 -year bond <br />responsibility period is often insufficient for the adequate development of shrub populations unless an <br />Collom — Rule 2, Page 107 Revision Date: 1/23/09 <br />Revision No.: PR -03 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.