My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2010-12-23_APPLICATION CORRESPONDENCE - C2010089
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Application Correspondence
>
Coal
>
C2010089
>
2010-12-23_APPLICATION CORRESPONDENCE - C2010089
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 4:28:14 PM
Creation date
12/27/2010 1:12:18 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C2010089
IBM Index Class Name
Application Correspondence
Doc Date
12/23/2010
Doc Name
Preliminary Adequacy Review (Part 1)
From
DRMS
To
Western Fuels Association, Inc.
Email Name
MLT
SB1
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
21
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
C- 2010 -089 PAR Part 1 <br />New Horizon North Mine <br />23- Dec -2010 <br />Page 12 of 21 <br />appear on Map 2.04.7 -1. Please explain. In addition, are all of the irrigation ditches and their <br />branches shown on the map? <br />8. In the "Effects of Mining on the Permit Area Geomorphology" section on page 23 of <br />Section 2.04.7, mention is made of Chiles Draw. This draw does not appear on Map 2.04.7- <br />1. Is this draw supposed to be Glasier Draw? <br />9. On page 21 of the Probable Hydrologic Consequences discussion of Section 2.04.7, it is <br />stated that the 2 nd Park Lateral irrigation ditch water will be put into a pipeline and diverted <br />around the mine site. After mining, the original ditch would be reestablished. Please point <br />out which maps show the proposed location of the pipeline. <br />10. The permit text contains two different Probable Hydrologic Consequences discussions, one <br />in Section 2.04.7 of Volume 1 and one in Section 2.05.6(3) of Volume 2. In order to avoid <br />confusion and since the PHC requirement is under Rule 2.05.6(3), the Division requests that <br />one PHC discussion be presented and that it be located in Section 2.05.6(3). <br />11. Map 2.04.7 -1 and Map 2.05.3(3) -1 show several surface water bodies within the permit area. <br />However, there is no discussion of these water bodies in the Site Specific Surface Water <br />Information section or in the Probable Hydrologic Consequences section of Section 2.04.7 <br />and 2.05.6(3). Please revise the appropriate permit text under Rule 2.04.7(2)(a) to include a <br />description, including ownership and use, of these water bodies. Depending on their use, <br />Rule 2.04.7(3), requiring alternate water supply information, may be applicable and these <br />water bodies may need to be added to the surface water hydrology monitoring program <br />required under Rule 2.05.6(3)(b)(iv). In addition, if water rights are involved, then, those <br />rights need to be protected under Rule 4.05.15. Please revise the text where necessary. <br />12. As shown in the surface water monitoring data sheets in Appendix 2.04.7 -2, monitoring sites <br />SW -N202 and SW -N203 experienced flows throughout the year but no full water quality <br />analyses were completed. Please explain. <br />2.04.8 — Climatological Information <br />In the second paragraph of Section 2.04.8, the New Horizon North Mine is referred to as the <br />"North Adjacent Mine" and the "North Adjacent Mine Expansion ". Please revise the text to <br />refer instead to the New Horizon North Mine. <br />2. Table 2.04.8 Climatological Information has been provided. Please identify the source from <br />which the data was obtained, for example, from the Western Regional Climate Center <br />station at Uravan, Colorado (058560), or other source, as appropriate. <br />2.04.9 — Soils Resource Information <br />1. Map 2.04.9 -1 does not show the limits of the mapping unit labeled "existing reclamation / <br />disturbance boundary ". The boundary for the "REC" mapping unit on this map does not <br />show a complete polygon. The northern boundary is open. Also this map shows two land <br />uses within the polygon; REC and WET, with no delineations within the area. Please define <br />the limits of the reclaimed lands versus the "wet" lands on the map. <br />2.04.10 — Vegetation Information <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.