Laserfiche WebLink
area to produce a gentle camber on the top of the fill which will direct runoff to the <br />West Taylor West Tributary and the West Taylor East Tributary Ditches. <br />22. Response Not Accepted. The following is the Division's original adequacy question for <br />your reference (please note that two additional questions have been asked in the following <br />paragraph, based on the Division's third and fourth comments, as a result of the new <br />designs submitted): Colowyo has provided a new Map 45 - South Taylor Fill, which shows <br />the East Taylor and West Taylor Fill plans and cross-sections. This plan view information <br />(less the cross-section details) for the East Taylor and West Taylor Fills is also shown on <br />Exhibit 7, Item 20, Figures 1 C-4 and 1 C-5 - West Taylor Pond Drainage and Figure 1 of the <br />Shannon and Wilson report. There are, however, two discrepancies between Map 45 and <br />Figures 1C-4 and 1C-5 and Figure 1 of the Shannon and Wilson report with regards to the <br />plan view for the East Taylor Fill. First, the configuration of the topography lines of the <br />temporary overburden stockpile on the East Taylor Fill is different in the figures as <br />compared to the map. The northwest corner of the temporary overburden stockpile is <br />approximately a 90° angle on Map 45. The same corner of the temporary overburden <br />stockpile on the West Taylor Pond figures and in the Shannon and Wilson report is more of <br />a point. There is also a difference in the southeast corner of the temporary overburden <br />stockpile plan. On Map 45 the southeast corner is basically a flat area, connecting with the <br />southwest and northeast corners of the pile. In the West Taylor Pond figures and in the <br />Shannon and Wilson figure the temporary overburden stockpile again comes to a point. <br />Second, the toe of the East Taylor Fill on Map 45 and Figure 1 of the Shannon and Wilson <br />report is not well defined as such. The plan view on the map and Figure 1 shows the toe of <br />the pile ending abruptly at the 7,700 foot elevation line and not toeing out to a point as <br />shown on Figures 1C-4 and 1-C5 (where the East Taylor East Tributary Ditch and East <br />Taylor West Tributary Ditch meet up). There is a distinct toe for the West Taylor fill on Map <br />45 and all of the aforementioned Shannon and Wilson figures. Please review the plan view <br />for the East Taylor Fill on Map 45, Exhibit 7, Item 20, Figures 1C-4 and 1C-5 and Figure 1 <br />of the Shannon and Wilson report and make the necessary changes/corrections to the <br />temporary overburden stockpile configuration and the toe of the permanent fill. <br />Based on the Division's review of the materials and information submitted in response to <br />the Division's original question 22 (above), Colowyo has not addressed this question. First, <br />in the response Colowyo states that Figures 1C-4 and 1C-5 of Exhibit 7, Item 20 have been <br />revised. These figures were not included in the 1 June 2010 Colowyo submittal. Second, <br />Colowyo states that the large, flat toe of the East Taylor Fill, ending at the elevation line of <br />7,700 feet, is correct. Colowyo further states that this toe will be approximately 400 to 500 <br />feet wide. Based on a review of the East Taylor Fill, cross-section A-A' shows that the final <br />toe of the fill is at an elevation of approximately 7,550 feet of elevation. This cross-section <br />shows that if the fill was to end at the 7,700 foot elevation point, there would be a drop-off of <br />approximately 200 feet to reach the original ground surface. Further, a review of Map 41A <br />- Watershed Boundaries for Hydrologic Modeling-South Taylor Area, shows the fill toeing <br />out at an elevation of approximately 7,550 feet, at the confluence of the East Taylor West <br />Tributary Ditch with the East Taylor East Tributary Ditch. Additionally, there are contour <br />ditches shown on the face of the East Taylor Fill (on Map 41A) at elevations of 7,700 feet <br />and 7,600 feet, which would not be possible if the fill toed out at 7,700 feet as depicted on <br />Map 45. Third, Colowyo has added what appears to be a large drain or notch to the East <br />Taylor Fill. This drain or notch is on the southwest edge of the fill (south of the E-E' cross- <br />section line and east of the A-A' cross-section line). Fourth, cross-section E-E' shows that <br />between approximately station 60+00 and station 70+00 the East Taylor Fill will gradually <br />rise from an elevation of 8,050 feet to an elevation of 8,150 feet and back down again to <br />approximately 8,050 feet. (Cross-section C-C' also depicts this hump from approximately