Laserfiche WebLink
the Colorado River system. Dams on the main stem Colorado River and its major tributaries <br />have segmented the river system, blocking migration routes. Dams also have drastically altered <br />flows, temperatures, and channel geomorphology. These changes have modified habitats in <br />many areas so that they are no longer suitable for breeding, feeding or sheltering. Major changes <br />in species composition have occurred due to the introduction of numerous nonnative fishes, <br />many of which have thrived due to man-induced changes to the natural riverine system. Habitat, <br />has been significantly degraded to where it impairs the essential fimctions of razorback sucker <br />such as reproduction and recruitment into the adult population. <br />Critical habitat was designated in 1994 within the 100-year floodplain of the razorback sucker's <br />historical range in the following area of the Upper Colorado River (59 F.R. 13374). The primary <br />constituent elements are the same as critical habitat for Colorado pikeminnow described above. <br />New Mexico. San Juan County; and Utah. San Juan County. The San Juan River from <br />the Hogback Diversion in T. 29 N., R. 16 W., section 9 to the full pool elevation at the <br />mouth ofNeskahai Canyon on the San Juan arm of hake Powell in T. 41 S., R. 11 E., <br />section 26. <br />Status and Distribution <br />The current distribution and abundance of the razorback sucker have been significantly reduced <br />throughout the Colorado River system, due to lack of recruitment to the adult population <br />(McAda 1987; McAda and Wydoski 1980; Holden and Stalnaker 1975; Minckley 1983; Marsh <br />and Minckley 1989; Tyus 1987). The only substantial population exists in Lake Mohave with a <br />current estimated population of less than 9,000 adults (Chuck Minckley pers. comm.) down from <br />the estimated 25,000 adult razorback suckers in 1995 (Chuck Minckley pers. comm.) which is <br />down from an earlier estimate of 60,000 adult razorback suckers (Minckley et al. 1991). They <br />do not appear to be successfully recruiting. While limited numbers of razorback suckers persist <br />in other locations in the Lower Colorado River, they are considered rare or incidental and may be <br />continuing to decline. <br />In the Upper Basin, above Glen Canyon Dam, razorback suckers are found in limited numbers in <br />both lentic and lotic environments. The largest population of razorback suckers in the Upper <br />Basin is found in the upper Green River and lower Yampa River (Tyus 1987). Lanigan and Tyus <br />(1989) estimated that from 758 to 1,138 razorback suckers inhabit the upper Green River. <br />Modde et al. (1996) reported no significant decrease in the population between 1982 and 1992, <br />and the continued presence of fish smaller than 480 mm during the study period suggested some <br />level of recruitment. In the Colorado River, most razorback suckers occur in the Grand Valley <br />area near Grand Junction, Colorado; however, they are increasingly rare. Osmundson and <br />Kaeding (1991) reported that the number of razorback sucker captured in the Grand Junction <br />area declined dramatically since 1974. In 1991 and 1992, 28 adult razorback suckers were <br />collected from isolated ponds adjacent to. the Colorado River near De Beque, Colorado (Burdick <br />1992). The existing habitat has been modified to the extent that it impairs essential behavior <br />patterns, such as breeding, feeding, and sheltering. <br />Razorback suckers are in imminent danger of extirpation in the wild. The razorback sucker was <br />listed as endangered October 23, 1991 (56 FR 54957). As Bestgen (1990) pointed out: <br />12