My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2010-11-22_REVISION - M2009023 (7)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Minerals
>
M2009023
>
2010-11-22_REVISION - M2009023 (7)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/16/2021 5:18:42 PM
Creation date
11/29/2010 9:30:15 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M2009023
IBM Index Class Name
REVISION
Doc Date
11/22/2010
Doc Name
Army Corps Permit
From
Department of the Army
To
La Plata Water Conservancy District
Type & Sequence
AR1
Email Name
KAP
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
96
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
(Lentsch et al. 1996). Monitoring in late 1996 and 1997 found these fish scattered in suitable <br />habitats from just below the upstream stocking site at Shiprock, New Mexico, to Lake Powell. <br />During the fall of 1997, the fish stocked in 1996 were caught in relatively high numbers and <br />exhibited good growth rates as well as good survival rates (Holden and Masslich 1997). In <br />August 1997, an additional 100,000 young-of-year Colorado pikeminnow were stocked in the <br />river. In October 1997, the young-of-year stocked two months previously were found distributed <br />below stocking sites and relatively large numbers also nearly 10 miles above the Shiprock <br />stocking location. The 1997 stocked fish were smaller than those stocked in 1996, but <br />apparently could move about the river to find suitable habitats (Holden and Masslich 1997). In <br />July 1998, an additional 10,571 young-of-year pikeminnows were stocked at Shiprock but only <br />one was found through March 1999 in the lower San Juan River (Archer et al 2000). <br />Furthermore in July 1999, 500,000 larval pikeminnow were stocked just below Hogback <br />Diversion at RM 158.6. The larvae were found 157 miles below the stocking site 62 hours later <br />and were never recaptured again. High flows in 1999 likely washed them into Lake Powell <br />(Jackson 2001). Due to the lack of retention in 1999, 105,000 larvae were stocked in June 2000 <br />just below Cudei Diversion (RM 142). Despite more normal flows in 2000, only four larvae <br />were found and three had floated 64 miles downstream in the two days since stocking. No 2090 <br />stocked larvae were found during a sampling trip four weeks later but a pikeminnow fitting the <br />size class of the 1999 stocking was found. During an October 2000 sampling trip three more <br />suspected 1999 stocked pikeminnows were captured but, again, no larvae stocked in 2000 were <br />found (Jackson 2001). <br />Razorback Sucker <br />Species/Critical Habitat Descriation <br />The razorback sucker, an endemic species unique to the Colorado River Basin, was historically <br />abundant and widely distributed within warmwater reaches throughout the Colorado River Basin. <br />The razorback sucker is the only sucker with an abrupt sharp-edged dorsal keel behind its head. <br />It has a large fleshy subterminal mouth that is typical of most suckers. Adults often exceed 3 kg <br />(6 pounds) in weight and 600 mm (2 feet) in length. <br />Historically, razorback suckers were found in the main stem Colorado River and major <br />tributaries in Arizona, California, Colorado, Nevada, New Mexico, Utah, Wyoming, and in <br />Mexico (Ellis 1914; Minckley 1983). Bestgen (1990) reported that this species was once so <br />numerous that it was commonly used as food by early settlers and, further, that commercially <br />marketable quantities were caught in Arizona as recently as 1949. In the Upper Basin, razorback <br />suckers were reported in the Green River to be very abundant near Green River, Utah, in the late <br />1800's (Jordan 1891). An account in Osmundson and Kaeding (1989) reported that residents <br />living along the Colorado River near Clifton, Colorado, observed several thousand razorback <br />suckers during spring runoff in the 1930s and early 1940s. In the San Juan River drainage, <br />Platania and Young (1989) relayed anecdotal historical accounts of "humpies," thought to be <br />razorback suckers ascending the Animas River to Durango, Colorado, around the turn of the <br />century. <br />A marked decline in populations of razorback suckers can be attributed to construction of dams <br />and reservoirs, introduction of nonnative fishes, and removal of large quantities of water from <br />. I1
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.