My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2010-11-12_PERMIT FILE - C1981010A (3)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Permit File
>
Coal
>
C1981010
>
2010-11-12_PERMIT FILE - C1981010A (3)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 4:26:47 PM
Creation date
11/26/2010 1:46:37 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981010A
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
11/12/2010
Section_Exhibit Name
1.0 Introduction
Media Type
D
Archive
Yes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
77
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• 1.4.1.3 impoundment Regradina <br />Calculation of regrade times for existing and future impoundments is shown in Table 1.4- <br />6. Impoundment volume calculations are shown in Table A -3 of Appendix A. Many of <br />the impoundments were assumed to be permanent structures. As a result, they were <br />left in place. Impoundments requiring reclamation include Far'East Buzzard, Coyote, <br />Middle Pyeatt, Sage, West Horse, and Deal. <br />The earthen impoundments would be graded with dozers, filling back the areas from <br />which the material had been previously removed. Caterpillar D10R dozers equipped <br />with a semi -u blade were used to develop cost data and productivity. This regrading <br />would establish the approximate original contours in the affected areas <br />1.4.2 Retopsoilina <br />After regrading, topsoil from permanent stockpiles would be placed on all disturbed <br />areas, except for such minor disturbances as light duty access roads, where topsoil was <br />never removed. Topsoil replacement costs are summarized in Table 1.4-6, while Table <br />1.4 -9 summarizes re- topsoil quantities and time. Productivity and cost values were <br />those of Caterpillar 637G scrapers. This equipment type, and particular model, was <br />selected as a cost efficient means of loading, transporting, and uniformly spreading the <br />topsoil. TALPAC software was used to determine scraper production per hour. The <br />• capacity used for each scraper load was 24 bank cubic yards. As a result, a 16% swell <br />is implied since the actual average capacity for a CAT 637G is 29 loose cubic yards (24 <br />CY struck capacity, 34 CY heaped capacity). <br />The areas requiring topsoil replacement would include all active, inactive, and <br />abandoned pits, and their associated roadways, impoundments, and the industrial <br />complex area. <br />Map M10B illustrates topsoil removal and replacement activities for each year of the <br />permit term, including the worst case year of 2012. This map is the basis for pit <br />disturbance areas. The industrial complex area, and other topsoil replacement areas <br />were calculated from mine workings maps. <br />A topsoil replacement area for roadways was calculated for roadways lengths as shown <br />on Map M9 and roadway disturbance widths. <br />For each of the topsoil replacement areas, a typical spread point location was <br />established from which average haul distances and grades were determined based upon <br />their locations and the permanent stockpile locations. Table 1.4 -9 summarizes the <br />results of each haul route. TALPAC software was used to calculate production rates. <br />The total amount of topsoil required to replace all disturbance during worst case bond <br />year 2012 is 3,274,300 cubic yards. Output from TALPAC is included in Appendix A. <br />Map M6, Bond Worst Case Year, 2012 shows the disturbed area, topsoil pile locations, <br />the location of final cuts, and regrade cross - section locations. <br />• <br />Revision. Pe- (,- <br />1 -41 Approved: -- - <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.