Laserfiche WebLink
(4 1) We have d urnentation from 1960 on from the USDA showing the pro rty being mined in <br />IRRIGATED C OPLAND and PRIME SOILS. We have the maps and the terature because <br />Mr. Morgan was signed up with the District Conservation program and even ore he bought <br />this place, it was in hayfields and pasture. THERE WERE NO ACCIDENT MISTAKES <br />.HERE. THIS W AS INTENTIONALNEGLECT AND CARE OF OUR PR ERTY by Western <br />Fuels and the Ste te should have done their jobs and made Western Fuels do air jobs.. I have <br />filed every year roduction records that are required by the state, it's nnandat ry. <br />(42) It's just lOce WFC submits an applicaton for Renewal of the Permit num 5 in 2007. And <br />did not approve 's until 2009 and we were suppose to know what happened or what was going <br />on when we d and begged in Numerous letters for a copy of Renewal 0 and we were <br />refused and igno d and never even got to see it unlit 2010. Lance Wade to the court house <br />and made sure it as then available, but we had called, asked the State, wrot to letters to Marcia <br />and sent faxes at d until I talked with A&. Berry in 2010, we never even kn what Permit <br />Renewal # 5 sal it was at the court house one day we went and when we w nt back, after our <br />request, it wasn' there no more and we found a letter to the court requesting - hat it be removed <br />after a few days en we went back to get a copy of that letter, it was also g ne. After we <br />contacted Mr. , then it appeared again We sent our objections letters be inning in 2007 and <br />Marcia threw the out because she said we didn't follow through How are w suppose to keep <br />up with what's g ing on if it's not at the court house, no one sent us a copy, d TWO YEARS <br />go by before it's oved??????? This is definitely a good sign of Landown r protection and <br />landowner rights being protected <br />(43) Your Rules Regulations also stated that an informal conference sho Id be held within <br />the area of the ne at a descent time. It was at night and away from the min and there was no <br />way we could po t anything out in the dark and mile down the road. I think Ihis was done <br />deliberately also xrause I had requested enough'time to show some of the ngs wrong and I <br />also had 15 copi made for the Board to be delivered to the Board requesting a formal hearing <br />and obj ections t PR-06 at that time and they refused to take them and mailin 15 copies of what <br />I had prepared is ow going to be a great deal of expense for me. <br />(44) Page 45 of -06 is a flat out lie and we do not appreciate the STATE ' g such <br />statements. It sa that topsoil has been already salvaged to a depth of 22 in as. The State <br />knows this is a li . Western Fuels has admitted to this and TOPSOIL was sal aged down to 72 <br />INCHES and w STOLEN off of this property and we are not going to keep owing the <br />STATE to cover p for Western Fuels. ALL OF THE SOIL SURVEY SHO OUR BARX <br />SOILS DOWN DEPTHS OF 72 inches and ALL OF THESE WERE RE ORTED TO THE <br />DIVISION THE AY THEY WERE STEALING THEM, I CALLED DAN WS. I <br />reported that th were stealing our soils prime soils and they were SALVAG and STOLEN <br />and put on Bud nsons. <br />(45) Page IS A pircel of land again not evaluated that had already been mined also containing <br />Barx. How man farmers have to suffer because Western Fuels did not provi a correct <br />documentation d the Division never took any action? <br />G aged LSTZ-S98--0G6 jejgTj RiTunwwo0 elTinjeN WdST=b OTOF 10 q00