My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2002-06-07_PERMIT FILE - M2002004
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Permit File
>
Minerals
>
M2002004
>
2002-06-07_PERMIT FILE - M2002004
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 2:18:41 PM
Creation date
10/15/2010 10:37:04 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M2002004
IBM Index Class Name
PERMIT FILE
Doc Date
6/7/2002
Doc Name
Pre-hearing Letter & Order
From
DMG
To
GCC Rio Grande, Inc.
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
7. Will surface and groundwater quality be protected from the potential impacts of the <br />blasting agents? (Rule 3.1.7 and 6.3.3(1) and (1)) <br />8. Does the applicant adequately specify how much water will be used in conjunction with <br />the operation, and the source of this water? (Rules 6.3.3(h) and 6.4.7(3) and (4)) <br />9. Does the applicant adequately describe drainage control during mining and after mining, <br />including all water diversions and impoundments? (Rule 6.4.4(c), 6.4.7(2)(c)) <br />10. Has the applicant adequately described what measures will be taken to minimize <br />disturbance to the prevailing hydrologic balance, prevent off-site damage, and provide for <br />a stable configuration of the reclaimed surface? (Rule 6.3.3(1)) <br />Wildlife <br />11. Does the application adequately address the significant wildlife resources on the affected <br />land and the effect of the proposed operation on those resources? (Rule 6.4.8) <br />12. Has the applicant provided an adequate description of the presence and estimated <br />populations of threatened and endangered species from the federal and state lists? (Rule <br />6.4.8(1)(c)) <br />13. Is reestablishment of wildlife habitat considered in the reclamation plan? (Rule 6.4.5(2)) <br />Soils information <br />14. Has the applicant addressed the soil characteristics in the area of the proposed operation <br />to the extent necessary to demonstrate its' suitability for revegetation? (Rule 3.1.9(6) and <br />(7), and Rule 6.3.2(a)) <br />15. Does the applicant address what measures will be taken to protect topsoil to avoid <br />deterioration, to protect the topsoil from erosion and to prevent contamination from <br />blasting? (Rule 3.1.9(1) and (3), 6.3.3(b)) <br />16. What methods will be used to segregate topsoil? (Rule 3.1.9(1)) <br />Vegetation Information <br />17. Will the proposed seed mix be capable of self-regeneration without continued <br />dependence on irrigation? (Rule 3.1.10(1), 3.1.10(5)) <br />18. Do the proposed seeding methods provide for the greatest probability of success? (Rule <br />3.1.10(4)) <br />19. Has the applicant committed to controlling prohibited noxious weeds? (Rule 3.1.10(6)) <br />4
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.