Laserfiche WebLink
PERMIT #: M-1977-306 <br />INSPECTOR'S INITIALS: GRM <br />INSPECTION DATE: September 23, 2010 <br />OBSERVATIONS <br />This inspection was conducted as part of the normal program monitoring program of the Colorado Division of <br />Reclamation, Mining, and Safety (DRMS). DRMS inspector Russ Means was accompanied by Cotter Representative <br />Glenn Williams. The JD-9 underground mine is a 112d-1 uranium mine located in Bull Canyon in Western Montrose <br />County. The mine has intermittent status and is currently on stand-by. <br />The mine identification sign and affected area boundary markers are in place and in compliance with Rule 3.1.12. The <br />sign is located at the main entrance gate. Permit boundaries are mostly identified by t-posts and geological features. <br />Some areas around disturbances are not well marked. The inspector notes that the permit boundary maps for this area are <br />very old and outdated. Many are from 1977 to 1994 and lack the detail and information that new maps require. While not <br />an issue currently DRMS will request new, up to date maps with the details and information with the next permittting <br />action. <br />Currently there are no underground activities taking place. The site appears to be being minimally maintained with no <br />issues being observed. The portal is secured by a heavy steel double gate. Equipment is parked next to the the main shop <br />area. The portal area and staging area are orderly free of trash with only minimal supplies stored. There is some <br />volunteer vegetion on dumps and around buildings such as rabbit brush and native grasses. The vegetation does not meet <br />any set reclamation standards. No noxious or problematic weeds were noted. <br />The inspector observed a subsidence approximately 150 to 200 feet north from the portal entrance. The subsidence is a <br />result of a failure in the main access adit for the mine. The subsidence appears to be very close to but within the permit <br />boundaries for this area. The subsidence is fenced off for safety and appears to be approximately 30 feet in diameter and <br />goes into the workings approximately 75 feet below. Cotter is evaluating the issue and must address it as part of any <br />reactivation plans. DRMS will have to include backfilling of the structure in its review of the reclamation liability until <br />the issue is corrected. <br />DRMS notes in the file that a CDPHE stormwater plan was filed in 1994. DRMS files do not indicate any updates since <br />that time. At this time the plan appears to be minimal and needs to be updated. If Cotter has updated the plans with <br />CDPHE DRMS should be sent copies of those updates. Any stormwater plans and control structures will have to be <br />incorporated into the pending Environmental Protection Plan (EPP) and meet the specifications outlined in Rule <br />7.3.1(3)for a two year/24 hour event up to the Probable Maximum Precipitation (PMP) event plus the ten year 24 hour <br />storm event. The plan for stormwater controls will need to include run off from dumps and roads, ore stockpile <br />sedimentation containment, site run-off containment and sedimentation structures, and site run-on diversions. <br />The JD-9 underground mine has a dewatering treatment system. The water is treated for radium using barium chloride. <br />The primary precipitation pond and secondary holding pond are located in a fenced area near the headframe on the upper <br />portion of the mine permit. The pits are lined, however they are beyond their life expectancy. Wethering and tearing of <br />the liners for the treatment and clean water ponds was observed. CWQD reportedly inspected the pond liners and found <br />them to be unacceptable as well. DRMS is notifiying the operator that no dewatering of any kind may occur until a new <br />treatment pond system plan is submitted, reviewed, and approved by DRMS. Since dewatering and treatment only occur <br />when the mine is in operation this is not a problem currently but must be addressed prior to any reactivation and withion <br />the EPP. <br />A review of the permit notes very little information on hydrology for the mine. The EPP will require a full analysis of the <br />groundwater regime in relation to mining activities. Some initial information was submitted in 2006 but the information <br />is basic and requirements have changed. All information will have to meet the EPP requirements for baseline <br />characterization and monitoring. The operator notes some issues with the monitor well located south of the main portal <br />which may require construction of a new one of gain useful data. The shallower waste pile pizometer has to date shown <br />no measurable water. <br />No petroleum products, fuels, ore or other hazardous materials issues were noted or observed at this time. <br />Page 2 of 3