My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2010-10-05_INSPECTION - C1984065
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Inspection
>
Coal
>
C1984065
>
2010-10-05_INSPECTION - C1984065
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 4:25:22 PM
Creation date
10/6/2010 11:53:13 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1984065
IBM Index Class Name
INSPECTION
Doc Date
10/5/2010
Doc Name
Inspection Report
From
DRMS
To
C.B. Minerals Company, LLC
Inspection Date
9/20/2010
Email Name
JRS
SB1
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
September 20, 2010 C-1984-065/Coal Ridge No. 1 Mine JRS <br />Inspection Topic Summary <br />NOTE: Y=Inspected N=Not Inspected R=Comments Noted V=Violation Issued NA=Not Applicable <br />N - Air Resource Protection R - Roads <br />R - Availability of Records N - Reclamation Success <br />R - Backfill & Grading R - Revegetation <br />N - Excess Spoil and Dev. Waste N - Subsidence <br />N - Explosives N - Slides and Other Damage <br />N - Fish & Wildlife N - Support Facilities On-site <br />R - Hydrologic Balance N - Signs and Markers <br />N - Gen. Compliance With Mine Plan N - Support Facilities Not On-site <br />N - Other N - Special Categories Of Mining <br />N - Processing Waste N - Topsoil <br />COMMENTS <br />This was a complete inspection of the Coal Ridge Mine conducted by Jim Stark of the Colorado Division of <br />Reclamation, mining and Safety. Steve Anthony (Garfield County Vegetation Manager) and Ken Seidel (also <br />with Garfield County). In addition to the required quarterly complete inspection, this inspection focused on a <br />knapweed problem at the mine site (see the "Revegetation" section below. The weather was cool and sunny and <br />the ground was dry at the time of the inspection. <br />AVAILABILITY OF RECORDS - Rule 5.02.4(1): <br />- All of the necessary records were available at the Garfield County Courthouse. Please see the "Availability of <br />Records" form at the end of this inspection report for more details. <br />BACKFILL and GRADING - Rule 4.14 Contemporaneous Reclamation 4.14.1; Approximate Original Contour <br />4.14.2; Highwall Elimination 4.14.1(2)(f); Steep Slopes 4.14.2, 4.27; Handling of Acid and Toxic Materials <br />4.14.3; Stabilization of Rills and Gullies 4.14.6: <br />- The backfilled portal area remains stable. There was no cracking or settling observed in the backfilled areas at <br />the time of the inspection. <br />HYDROLOGIC BALANCE - Rule 4.05 Drainage Control 4.05.1, 4.05.2, 4.05.3; Siltation Structures 4.05.5, <br />4.05.6; Discharge Structures 4.05.7, 4.05.10; Diversions 4.05.4; Effluent Limits 4.05.2; Ground Water <br />Monitoring 4.05.13; Surface Water Monitoring 4.05.13; Drainage - Acid and Toxic Materials 4.05.8; <br />Impoundments 4.05.6, 4.05.9; Stream Buffer Zones 4.05.18: <br />- The remaining sediment pond was dry at the time of the inspection. The pond was well vegetated and stable and <br />no erosional problems were noted. There was a large patch of Russian Knapweed on the bottom of the pond. <br />ROADS - Rule 4.03 Construction 4.03.1(3)/4.03.2(3); Drainage 4.03.1(4)/4.03.2(4); Surfacing and Maintenance <br />4.03.1(5) and (6)/4.03.2(5) and (6); Reclamation 4.03.1(7)/4.03.2(7): <br />- The remaining road has basically filled in to the point where the road is now a two-track. The road was stable <br />Number of Partial Inspection this Fiscal Year: 0 <br />Number of Complete Inspections this Fiscal Year: 1 <br />Page 2 of 8
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.