My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2010-09-24_ENFORCEMENT - M1977300
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Enforcement
>
Minerals
>
M1977300
>
2010-09-24_ENFORCEMENT - M1977300
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 4:23:28 PM
Creation date
10/1/2010 2:21:11 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1977300
IBM Index Class Name
ENFORCEMENT
Doc Date
9/24/2010
Doc Name
Complaint for Judicial Review, Declaratory and Injunctive Relief
From
Cotter Corporation
To
DRMS
Violation No.
MV2010018
Email Name
AJW
DB2
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
46
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
162 <br />1 monitoring program will not alone determine this, <br />2 and in addition, Cotter should have provided a.bond <br />3 for some period of time in the event that activity <br />4 treatment is still necessary. The bond should cover <br />5 installation of passive treatment in this system. <br />6 We believe that taking action now to <br />7 prevent harm before harm occurs from the mine pool. <br />8 is imperative. We must meet at least the background <br />9 standards of Ralston Creek above the mine before it <br />10 reaches the creek. <br />11 One of my jobs is to manage the <br />12 residuals that we treat out of our water, water <br />13 treatment residuals. Right now we are able to <br />14 beneficially reuse these as a compost. There are' <br />15 rules that we monitor uranium, thorium, radium-226 <br />16 and 228 in these residuals. <br />17 If we were to see these increase and <br />18 push us out of compliance with the composting regs, <br />19 we would have to industrial-landfill and handle <br />20 these differently in disposal, which could increase <br />21 costs significantly, and we don't feel like the <br />22 customer should bear that cost for that increased <br />23 disposal cost. Jim. <br />24 MR. MCCARTAY: Thank you very much. <br />25 Jim McCarthy, City of Arvada, regulator <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.