My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2010-09-14_ENFORCEMENT - M1977300 (2)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Enforcement
>
Minerals
>
M1977300
>
2010-09-14_ENFORCEMENT - M1977300 (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 4:22:20 PM
Creation date
9/21/2010 8:03:53 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1977300
IBM Index Class Name
ENFORCEMENT
Doc Date
9/14/2010
Doc Name
Reply of Cotter Corporation/ Petition for Reconsideration.
From
Holme Roberts & Owen LLP
To
DRMS
Email Name
DB2
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
22
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Page 4 of 5 <br />Division's evidence, which it did not do. The hearing before the Board lasted over six hours. Moreover, the <br />Division had no obligation to file a written response to Cotter's June 25th Rationale. Indeed, the Rationale <br />presented nothing that the Division hadn't heard before from Cotter. I specifically told that to Charlotte in the <br />days prior to the hearing and gold her that the hearing would proceed. Cotter's allegation in its transmittal letter <br />is baseless. Cotter's attachment 1 should not be considered and should be stricken from the record. <br />>>> Charlotte Neitzel <Charlotte.Neitzel@hro.com> 7/30/2010 6:43 PM >>> <br />I obviously disagree for the reasons stated in my transmittal letter. <br />Charlotte L. Neitzel <br />Holme Roberts & Owen LLP <br />1700 Lincoln St., Ste. 4100 <br />Denver, CO 80203 <br />Direct: 303-866-0487 <br />Fax: 303-866-0200 <br />charlofte.neitzel@hro.com <br />From: Cheryl Linden [maiito:Cheryl.Linden@state.co.us] <br />Sent: Friday, July 30, 2010 5:47 PM <br />To: Charlotte Neitzel; Jillian Allison; Peter Hack <br />Cc: david.berry@state.co.us; loretta.pineda@state.co.us <br />Subject: Re: Cotter's Comments Part 4 of 4 <br />Upon initial review, it appears that Cotter's attachment 1 is attempting to submit additional evidence and not <br />simply commenting on the proposed order. The Division objects to this. The hearing is over - the Board has <br />closed testimony and the Board has ruled. Accordingly, Cotter's attachment 1 should be stricken. <br />>>> Jillian Allison 7/30/2010 5:32 PM >>> <br />Thank you. I've forwarded all of the parties' comments to the Board Chair for her review and consideration. <br />Jillian Allison <br />Assistant Attorney General <br />Business & Licensing Section <br />Office of the Attorney General <br />303-866-4395 <br />FAX 303-866-5671 <br />This message may contain confidential and/or legally privileged information and is intended only for the named <br />recipients. Any name or signature block is not a legally binding electronic signature. If you are not an intended <br />recipient you are not authorized to disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail. Please notify the sender <br />immediately if you have received this e-mail by mistake and delete this e-mail from your system. <br />>>> On 7/30/2010 at 5:20 PM, in message <OE7BD415B5298F4B878BF1B408B2AB3DO1078851E80E@DENCO- <br />EXCCR.hroad.hro.com>, Charlotte Neitzel <Charlotte. Neitzel@ hro.com> wrote: <br />Charlotte L. Neitzel <br />Holme Roberts & Owen LLP <br />1700 Lincoln St., Ste. 4100 <br />Denver, CO 80203 <br />9/14/2010
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.