My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1996-10-29_REVISION - M1977493
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Minerals
>
M1977493
>
1996-10-29_REVISION - M1977493
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/16/2021 5:41:06 PM
Creation date
8/31/2010 11:00:52 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1977493
IBM Index Class Name
REVISION
Doc Date
10/29/1996
Doc Name
Outlet Works Construction
From
Climax Molybdenum
To
DMG
Type & Sequence
SR2
Email Name
ACS
Media Type
D
Archive
No
Tags
DRMS Re-OCR
Description:
Signifies Re-OCR Process Performed
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
109
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Gate Stem and Stage Marker Anchor Bolts. Anchor bolts for the gate stem <br /> assembly and stage marker were misplaced during project construction. The contractor <br /> obtained and installed stainless steel replacement bolts, rather than originally specified <br /> galvanized steel. Bent anchor bolts were installed for the stage marker, similar to the gate <br /> stem assembly bolts, rather than straight bolts with wedged shims. <br /> Outlet Trench Backfill Material. The new outlet conduit, including upper and lower <br />• concrete cradles, was constructed in a trench approximately five feet wide and four to six <br /> feet deep. The contractor requested permission to place a flow fill mixture as backfill to <br /> the top of the trench, rather than the compacted embankment fill. A modified flow fill with <br /> a cement content of 3 sacks (282 pounds) per cubic yard was proposed and approved by <br /> the Office of the State Engineer. Placement of flow fill in the trench resulted in good <br /> contact between the existing embankment and the trench backfill without use of <br /> compaction equipment which would have been required with soil fill. <br /> Filter Blanket Installation. Subsequent to resuming work after the winter shutdown, <br /> a persistently wet and seeping area of the original embankment backfill was apparent at <br /> the west end, on the north side of the conduit. Following recommendations provided by <br /> Alan Claybourn of Kumar and Associates, the contractor removed all wet material which <br /> had been disturbed by equipment traffic and placed a one foot thick filter blanket <br /> consisting of Type I filter sand in the area of concern. The filter blanket was tied into the <br /> filter sand backfill around the slotted drain pipes behind the outlet headwall to provide a <br /> flow path exiting the dam. Sheet 2 of the As-Constructed drawings shows the <br /> approximate location of the filter blanket. <br /> Bypass Conduit Abandonment. Close examination of the existing 24-inch <br /> corrugated metal bypass conduit, previously used to convey water from the interceptor <br /> canal through the dam, showed that the conduit was in good condition and adequate for <br /> grouting with the exception of an obstruction in the pipe. The obstruction was located at <br /> an elbow approximately 125 feet from the downstream end, and required removal of the <br /> elbow and all conduit below the elbow. The filter diaphragm was subsequently placed <br /> 5 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.