My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2010-08-20_PERMIT FILE - M2009076
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Permit File
>
Minerals
>
M2009076
>
2010-08-20_PERMIT FILE - M2009076
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 4:19:34 PM
Creation date
8/24/2010 8:07:07 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M2009076
IBM Index Class Name
PERMIT FILE
Doc Date
8/20/2010
Doc Name
Review
From
Upper Clear Creek Watershed Association
To
DRMS
Email Name
ACS
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Review of Venture Resources Inc. <br />Proposal: Hukill Gulch Millsite; File No. M-2002-076 <br />Page 2 <br />operate their mill at 40 to 80 tpd, the bin will have to be filled about once or twice a week. <br />In order to move this amount of material, 20 dump truck loads will travel over the <br />mountain roads each week. The opportunity for spills or traffic accidents related to the <br />increased truck traffic (and concomitant water pollution) is accordingly increased. Over the <br />last decade, vehicle accidents, and related spills into Clear Creek and its tributaries, have <br />been the most common reason for downstream water users to shut water intakes to avoid <br />drinking water contamination. <br />We further oppose imported fill feed because we are concerned that the disturbance of any <br />mined rock that has for years been exposed to weathering inevitably exposes material that <br />may be more leachable than that removed. Should the Division approve this imported <br />material, the import area should be included in the permit and have a plan of remediation <br />and run-on and run-off management. We also believe that any disturbance of a previously <br />mined area or waste rock pile should trigger the requirements of a Designated Mining <br />Operation, particularly the preparation of an Environmental Protection Plan (EPP) as <br />required in 6.4.20 of the regulations. There is adequate information in the CERCLA <br />records that demonstrate the acid or toxic producing properties of the previously mined <br />areas in the Central City/Clear Creek Superfund Area. <br />We seriously doubt that the tailings will be inert. As metallurgical recoveries of any <br />process are never 100 percent, any leachate will doubtless contain metals that will be <br />released to the environment. UCCWA believes that the tailings storage proposed as part of <br />this project should also trigger the designation of this project as a Designated Mining <br />operation as defined in Section 1.15 and require the preparation of an EPP under Section <br />6.4.20 of the regulations. <br />On page 5 of the Adequacy Response-Stormwater Management Plan [file 7/29/2010, <br />2:43:44PM-JWD] Venture Resources state that the potentially most significant source of <br />stormwater contamination is from waste rock on site. While we agree that the waste rock <br />will be a significant source of stormwater contamination, we believe stormwater <br />contamination from the proposed tailings impoundment is at least as great if not greater. <br />We appreciate the opportunity to provide comments. <br />Sincerely, <br /> <br />Anne Beierle <br />UCCWA Co-chair
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.