My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2010-06-01_REVISION - C1981019 (5)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Coal
>
C1981019
>
2010-06-01_REVISION - C1981019 (5)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 4:12:37 PM
Creation date
8/18/2010 1:12:58 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981019
IBM Index Class Name
REVISION
Doc Date
6/1/2010
Doc Name
Exhibit 5 2006, 2007, 2008 & 2009 Phase II Vegetation Reports
From
Colowyo Coal Company
To
DRMS
Type & Sequence
SL4
Email Name
JRS
SB1
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
132
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
nmin = (t 2s 2 ) / (0.1 X )2 <br />where: n = the number of actual samples collected (initial size = 15 or 36) <br />t = the value from the one - tailed t distribution for 90% confidence with n -1 <br />degrees of freedom; <br />S 2 = the variance of the estimate as calculated from the initial samples; <br />x = the mean of the estimate as calculated from the initial samples. <br />If the initial samples do not provide a suitable estimate of the mean (i.e., the inequality is false), <br />additional samples would be collected until the inequality (n, <_ n) becomes true. <br />2.4 Success Evaluation <br />Success evaluations involve a direct (and perhaps statistical test) comparison of appropriate <br />parameters for each variable of interest. In the case of ground cover, comparisons are made against <br />reference area data of the same year. There are two methods in which reference area comparisons can <br />be made. The first is an absolute perennial cover comparison in which annual and biennial cover is <br />completely deleted from the vegetation cover data set. Implementation of this method requires noxious <br />weeds and annual and biennial cover be removed from the data set for the Phase II sampling area as <br />well as the two reference areas. Absolute perennial cover then becomes the only remaining data that <br />can then be used in a direct or statistical reference area comparison. <br />The second method uses guidance provided by the Colorado Department of Mining, Reclamation, <br />and Safety. These guidelines provide an opportunity for an allowable contribution of 10% relative cover <br />of annual and biennial cover to be used in the reference area comparison. Using this comparison <br />method, annual and biennial cover must then be included from the reference area. However, as with the <br />first method, implementation of this second procedure requires noxious weeds be removed from total <br />cover data set. Next, annual and biennial absolute cover must be converted into relative cover to <br />facilitate a determination of the 10% maximum. Annual and biennial cover exceeding 10% relative cover <br />can then be converted back to absolute cover to be deducted from the total remaining cover without <br />noxious weeds. The result of this calculation is perennial cover with the 10% allowable relative cover of <br />CEDAR CREEK ASSOCIATES, INC. Page 7 Colowyo Coal Co. Phase 11 Evaluation <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.