Laserfiche WebLink
This issue is resolved. The table was revised correctly in the submittal dated July 8, 2010. <br />Section 2.05.3 Operation Plan <br />34. On revised pages 2.05-15 and 2.05-21, reference is made to the Quonset but and Map 42. Please <br />remove the reference to Map 42 since TR-66 has been withdrawn. <br />This issue is resolved. Page 2.05-15 was revised appropriately in the June 1, 2010 submittal. <br />35. Please remove references to the Terror Creek shaft and escape system on revised page 2.05-21 since <br />TR-66 was withdrawn. <br />This issue is resolved. The reference was removed from revised page 2.05-21 in the June 1, 2010 <br />submittal. <br />36. In the last paragraph on revised page 2.05-48, please explain why the statement is made that drill hole <br />BRL-1-03-01 might also be known as BRL-04-01. <br />This issue is resolved. The statement was deleted on revised page 2.05-48 of the July 8, 2010 <br />submittal. <br />37. The Active Monitoring Wells Completion Summary Table that is currently provided in the PAP on page <br />2.05-83 appears to have been removed from the permit text. This table contains critical information that <br />needs to be retained in the permit document. Please ensure that this table is updated for the revised <br />groundwater monitoring plan if needed and reincorporated into the PAP. <br />This issue is resolved. In the June 1, 2010 submittal, BRL supplied page 2.05-1251. <br />Section 2.05.5 Postmining Land Uses <br />38. In the second paragraph on revised page 2.05-85, please update the disturbed area acreage range. <br />This issue is resolved. Page 2.05-85 was revised accordingly in the June 1, 2010 submittal. <br />39. In the next to the last paragraph on revised page 2.05-85, please update the second sentence to <br />acknowledge that land other than that owned by the applicant has also been disturbed. <br />This issue is resolved. Revised page 2.05-85 was provided in the submittal dated June 1, 2010. <br />40. In the last paragraph on revised page 2.05-85, please update the first sentence to show that other <br />landowners are involved. <br />This issue is resolved. In the June 1, 2010 submittal, BRL stated that the BLM and the USDA-FS were <br />involved in the review. <br />41. As was brought up in Section 2.04.3 above, in the second sentence of the last paragraph on revised <br />page 2.05-85, please update, if appropriate, the statement that Delta County does not have any land <br />use regulations. There is an example of county approval in the middle of revised page 2.05-87. <br />9