Laserfiche WebLink
• <br /> <br />• <br />TRIIENVIRONMENTAL, INC. <br />2Ei6EW4L1% tl Texas Research International Company <br />Hydraulic Conductivity <br />Client: Venture Resources <br />Project: Hukill Gultch Millsite <br />Sample: Course Fraction <br />Hydraulic Conductkity vs. Pore Volumes <br />1.1-03 <br />E <br />41 LE-04 <br />.y <br />LE-05 <br />x <br />1 r of <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> r <br /> <br /> <br />0.00 0.20 <br />LE-03 <br />U <br />E <br />LE-04 <br />.y <br />1.E-05 <br />4 <br />1.E-06 <br />0.40 0.60 0.80 1.00 <br />Pore Volume (cc) <br />Hydraulic ConductWty':-s. Time <br />i ! h <br /> ? <br />t <br />-' -- i I <br />- <br /> , <br />0.0 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 <br />Time (hours) <br />TRI Log#: E2337-21-10 <br />Test Method: ASTM D 5084, Method C <br />Test Date: 04/22/10 <br />INITIAL VALU ES <br />Sample Height (in) 1.50 <br />Sample Diameter (in) 2.80 <br />Wet Weight (g) 248.2 <br />Saris le Area in2 6.15 <br />Sample Volume (cc) 150.7 <br />Moisture content (%) 15.17 <br />Wet Density (pcf) 102.8 <br />Dry_ Density (pc f) 89.3 <br />G, (assumed) 2.65 <br />Degree of Saturation 47.1 <br />Void Ratio 0.85 <br />Porosity 0.46 <br />1 Pore Volume (cc) 69.4 <br />Eff. Confining Stress (psi) 69.4 <br /> Hydraulic Conductivity <br />Time (hrs) k (cm/sec) k at 20 deg C <br />(cm/sec) <br />0.08 8.3E-05 8.1E-05 <br />0.30 8.3E-05 8.1E-05 <br />0.63 7.6E-05 7.4E-05 <br />097 7.8E-05 7.6E-05 <br />1.30 6.9E-05 6.8E-05 <br />1.73 7.4E-05 7.2E-05 <br />2.00 6.8E-05 6.7E-05 <br />3.12 6.7E-05 6.5E-05 <br />3.65 6.9E-05 6.8E-05 <br />Ava. K' 20 deg, C: 6.81105 <br />Note 1: The soil was air dried and retained on a No. 100 sieve. Soil was 1: Average corrected hydraulic conductivity <br />remolded a target dry density of 85 % standard Proctor at +4% wet (k2p) is obtained from the last 4 average <br />optimum moisture content or 98.7 lb/ft3 dry density at a moisture content readings. <br />of 15.4 %. Specimens was prepared using Harvard compaction tamper of <br />0.5-in lifts iiith kneading compaction. <br />Note 2: A 13-value of 095 was achieved. The effective confining pressure Cheng-Wei Chen, 05/16/10 <br />was 69.4 psi (-- 10,000 psf) per test request. Analysis & Quality Review/Date <br />Tested by: Caleb McCord <br />The testing herein is based upon accepted industry practice as well as the test method listed. Test results reported herein do not apply <br />to samples other than those tested. TRI neither accepts responsibility for nor makes claim as to the final use and purpose ofthe material. <br />TRI observes and maintains client confidentiality. TRI limits reproduction ofthis report, except in full, without prior approval ofTRI. <br />9063 Bee Caves Road ? Austin, TX 78733-6201. ? (512) 263-2101 ? (512) 263-2558 ? 1-800-880-TE917