Laserfiche WebLink
reclamation activities, reaching agreement on all issues as documented in <br />the attached letter to Mike Morgan dated June 21, 2010 (attached hereto <br />as Attachment 4). <br />5. As requested by the Morgan Family, WFC agreed to keep bench 1 <br />overburden existing on the Morgan Property so that it would be put back <br />on the Morgan Property following mining. See, Attachment 4. This <br />agreement will be contained in PR 06 at Section 2.05.4(2)(c) and in Map <br />2.05.4-7. <br />6. WFC agreed in principle to DRMS staff's recommendations regarding <br />topsoil redistribution, which were presented to Mike Morgan in a face-to- <br />face meeting on June 24, 2010. See, memorandum to file by Ross <br />Gubka dated June 24, 2010, attached hereto as Attachment 5 (note that <br />JoEllen Turner declined to participate in this meeting). WFC also <br />presented these recommendations to the Morgan family in writing on the <br />same date. See, letter from Ross Gubka to Mike Morgan and JoEllen <br />Turner dated June 24, 2010, attached hereto as Attachment 6. <br />7. WFC agreed to the DRMS request to use NRCS recommendations for <br />seed bed preparation, green manure, alfalfa seeding rate and <br />methodology, fertilization, and crop rotation. WFC received approval of <br />the proposed practices on June 30, 2010, and plans to incorporate them <br />into the reclamation of the Morgan Property (as well as other properties). <br />See, letter from Jim Boyd, NRCS, to Concerned Parties, with attached <br />recommendations, attached hereto as Attachment 7. WFC has no reason <br />to believe these DRMS requirements will not be accepted by the Morgan <br />family. <br />8. WFC agreed to calculate irrigation water requirements per the NRCS <br />recommended method, which calculation led to the proposed use of 62 <br />shares that were agreed to in the April 19, 2010 Letter Agreement (see <br />Attachment 3). <br />9. WFC agreed to put a replacement water well wherever the Morgan family <br />wants it on their Property, and is waiting only for Mike Morgan to <br />designate the family's preferred location. <br />The above agreements encompass virtually every detail of the proposed <br />reclamation of the Morgan Property, and indeed after reaching these agreements <br />it is unclear to WFC what, if any, disputed issues would remain between the <br />Morgan family (and their attorney in fact) and WFC. However, should any <br />outstanding issues remain that have not been settled by agreement, WFC will <br />continue to meet with the Morgan family and/or their representatives in order to <br />make every effort to do so. The issues raised by Ms. Turner in her comment <br />letter are either issues that have already been agreed between the parties, or are <br />issues that Ms. Turner raises for the first time without having presented them to <br />2