My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2010-07-29_REVISION - C1981008
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Coal
>
C1981008
>
2010-07-29_REVISION - C1981008
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 4:17:00 PM
Creation date
7/29/2010 12:54:02 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981008
IBM Index Class Name
REVISION
Doc Date
7/29/2010
Doc Name
Response to Adequacy Review No. 3 (Response to Morgan Property Issues)
From
Western Fuels Colorado
To
DRMS
Type & Sequence
PR6
Email Name
SB1
MLT
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
94
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
production because that is what the Morgan family requested. The Morgans <br />have already agreed to these points, and in light of such agreement it is difficult <br />to determine the relevance of much of this comment. WFC will not respond to <br />the personal attacks and inflammatory statements contained in this comment. <br />Comment No. 10: <br />Page 2.04.3-8 First off, NH2 required an ENTIRE NEW PERMIT <br />APPLICATION. This was required by the State since NH 1 and NH2 were not <br />contiguous. Since the new permit was required by the State, the accuracy of <br />this permit should have been required and the correct terminology required <br />according to the Pre-Mine Land use definitions as required in 1.04. No add <br />on, no changing the meaning, just the facts. <br />WFC Response: <br />WFC cannot determine what, if any, relevance this comment has to PR 06. <br />Comment No. 11: <br />Page 2.04 3-8 Lies! "There are other crop areas in the vicinity for silage corn, <br />but none in the permit area. Every field that we own on this place has been <br />planted in corn at one time or another during rotation. And has not only <br />been used for silage corn, but we have been up many tons of grain in grain <br />bins. Alfalfa kills alfalfa so overseeding is not possible. So when production <br />falls off, we plow up, plant in corn, oats, wheat, etc and then after as year or <br />two, go back to the alfalfa. <br />On San Miguel Powers Property, when we had it, we also planted corn and <br />wheat. We are the only ones in this area that raise Straight Alfalfa. Most of <br />the farmers had a grass or grass/ alfalfa, but most all was harvested. <br />"We believe that one area of former irrigated hayland should be classified as <br />irrigated cropland:" Another very stupid statement. All of the Pre-mine use of <br />the Morgan properties was irrigated cropland. When Lance Wade signed the <br />lease in 1998 he put "all of the property will be returned to farmable, row <br />crop condition, alfalfa." This is his words. We had no pasture or just <br />haylands as they say. "One area" All of the fields on the Morgan property <br />being mined were historically irrigated and cropped as per letter attached <br />form Jim Boyd, NRCS. <br />The fields East approximately 50 acres part of the Sunshine place was <br />producing 700 ton of corn and had just been put in AV 120 alfalfa prior to the <br />acquisition of the property. <br />The fields West had also been planted in corn and wheat and prior to them <br />mining Morgans property in 1999/2000, were returned to alfalfa. Weimers <br />felt that was one of the best corn fields they had ever seen in the state.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.