My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2010-07-27_PERMIT FILE - M2010008
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Permit File
>
Minerals
>
M2010008
>
2010-07-27_PERMIT FILE - M2010008
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 4:16:51 PM
Creation date
7/27/2010 1:29:27 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M2010008
IBM Index Class Name
PERMIT FILE
Doc Date
7/27/2010
Doc Name
Adequacy Review
From
Eastern Colorado Aggregates
To
DRMS
Email Name
JLE
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
16
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
20.) The letter from the Division of Wildlife submitted for this exhibit indicates blasting <br />during spring nesting and calving season may impact the local wildlife in the area. The <br />Division of Wildlife requested that no blasting be done between mid-March through mid- <br />May. Please commit to not conducting blasting operations from March 15 to May 165. <br />A: We agree not to blast between March 15 and May 15. <br />21.) Will topsoil and overburden be removed from the entire 67 acre permit area? It may <br />be necessary to remove topsoil from the "Stock Pile Area," however; will it be necessary <br />to remove overburden? If not, this may lower the cost of reclamation. <br />A: Topsoil and overburden will not be removed from the entire 67 acre permit <br />area. Topsoil will be removed in all mining and stockpile areas and any <br />overburden. Areas not mined or used for stockpiles will not be stripped. <br />22.) As indicated on the Exhibit C map, a road runs through the permit area. Who is the <br />owner of this road? For this structure, the Operator must: <br />a.) Provide a notarized agreement between the applicant and the person(s) <br />having an interest in the structure, that the applicant is to provide <br />compensation for any damage to the structure; or <br />b.) Where such an agreement cannot be reached, the applicant shall <br />provide an appropriate engineering evaluation that demonstrates that such <br />structure shall not be damaged by activities occurring at the mining <br />operation. <br />A: We have attached a notarized letter between ECA and Sikes. <br />23.) Enclosed with this review is correspondence from the Colorado Division of Water <br />Resources and the Office of Archaeology and Historic Preservation in regards to this <br />amendment application. Please address their concerns. <br />A: We will follow state law CRS 24-80 Part 13. <br />24.) In accordance with Rule 1.6.2 (d) & (e) and Rule 1.6.5, within ten (10) days after <br />the application was deemed complete and submitted, you must have published a notice in <br />a newspaper of general circulation in the locality of the proposed mining operation once a <br />week for four (4) consecutive weeks. Also, immediately after the first publication you <br />were to mail a copy of the notice to all owners of record or surface and mineral rights <br />holders of any recorded easements and all owners of record of lands that are within 200 <br />feet of the boundary of the affected land. Proof of notice and mailings such as Certified <br />Mail Return Receipt Requested must be submitted to the Division of Reclamation, <br />Mining and Safety prior to the decision date. <br />A: Please see the attached proof of publication and notices. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.